Paralegal work

Hi everyone,

This summer, I graduated from university; I did well academically, but I didn't have a training contract lined up, so I decided that I'd look for paralegal roles (or anything adjacent to this; basically, anything that would be useful legal work experience) post-graduation, whilst applying to vac schemes. I've only just got round to starting to look for paralegal work (yes - I don't blame anyone reading this for thinking I've left it very late), and I was wondering how people went about finding it!

In particular, I'd be really interested to hear about whether there are any paralegal recruitment agencies that people would recommend for roles in London and/or the South East. (especially London if possible!)
Also, I remember when talking to Jessica Booker (who used to be on this forum) that she talked about how it could be useful to send speculative emails to people (with CVs attached) to "lateral hire recruiters". With this in mind, would it be a logical step to email people specialising in lateral recruitment at firms, to ask them if they've got any paralegal roles?

If anyone has any ideas, I'd be hugely grateful! :) Apologies if my questions are a bit stupid; I feel a bit directionless post-university, and I don't really know what questions are best to ask for someone in my situation.
  • Like
Reactions: Xx123_

Is it worth submitting last-minute applications for firms recruiting on a rolling basis?

As deadlines for many firms are fast approaching and we are entering in the busiest time for applications in the year, a question many candidates ask around this point in the application cycle is: it is worth investing time and effort to complete a last-minute application for a firm recruiting on a rolling basis?

This is an issue I used to worry about a lot - and for good reasons: I would find myself in the unfortunate (although very common) situation where I had intended to apply to a given firm a long time ago but had procrastinated on it, only to now have only a few days left to try to research the firm in depth and try to write high-quality answers. The matter was stressful enough simply given how pressed for time I would be with other applications, but when this was a firm recruiting on a rolling basis, I would then have the additional anxiety and worry that all of my efforts would be in vain - for I (wrongly) assumed my chances of progressing would be minimal given how last-minute I had left things. As such, I would end up doubting whether it is even worth submitting the application and whether it would be better to abandon it and move on to another firm.

Fortunately, in my second application cycle, I ended up taking the advice of some seniors and still went through with these last-minute applications at rolling firms. I was therefore progressed past the applications stage in more than by more than a couple of these firms, and ended up even invited to the AC by one. Taking a broader view, my progression/rejection rate was not substantially worse in these last-minute applications for rolling firms than in my normal applications for non-rolling firms. As such, my general advice for people who are facing the same issue is the same one I have received before: unless this is a firm that is known to place a very heavy emphasis on early submissions, you should try to complete and submit even a last-minute applications for rolling firms - provided that you estimate you will still have enough time to write objectively high-quality applications.

There are a number of reasons why I think this makes sense and why most last-minute submissions are not just doomed to fail:
  1. According to many recruiters I have spoken to, even firms recruiting on a rolling deadline receive the vast majority of their applications the last 48 hours before the deadline. As such, if they do not want to automatically take out a huge pool of talent, recruiters simply cannot afford to not give application sent around that time proper consideration.
  2. For the same reason, even if you only manage to submit an application to a rolling firm 1-2 days before the deadline, chances are you will still have submitted earlier than most other candidates. As such, this is not a factor that would likely be held very strongly against you.
  3. Finally, most recruiters I have talked to embrace a holistic approach to assessment of candidates and decision-making, with their aim simply being to identify the best potential future lawyers. While early submission can be indicative to good planning and a stronger interest in the firm, this is but one factor among many that a graduate recruiter will consider when deciding the outcome of your application. As such, if everything otherwise is really strong, you should still have a good chance of being progressed.

First-year Insight Scheme Application

Hello, as I know this platform is home to advice guiding students to apply for first-year open days and insight schemes in London Law firms. I was wondering if there is any specific way to begin the application process. Although I am aware of the general idea that one should use the specific firm's values, practice and core principles to relate to my own academic, work or legal experience, I wonder how exactly the application should be formatted. I understand that the application should showcase my willingness to learn rather then act as a CV application by promoting my experiences, but if there are any tips on how to start writing it, it would be very helpful!

Thank you!
  • ✅
Reactions: Andrei Radu

Open Day Networking 2025

Well, that wraps-up my open day programme for 2025.

Thank you very much to everyone from the TCLA forum who said hello at one of the following events. It was great to meet you offline!

Charles Russell Speechlys, Guildford
LawCareersNet LIVE, London
Cooley, London
Simmons & Simmons, Oxford
Simmons & Simmons, London
Lewis Silkin, London
Skadden, London
Willkie, London
Kennedys, Sheffield

If we didn't get a chance to connect on LinkedIn at the time, please feel free: https://www.linkedin.com/in/will-kitchen-63997a23a/

Best of luck with your applications!

Diplomat -> Lawyer - Advice Needed!

Hi all,

Long-time lurker. I'd really appreciate some candid advice.

I'm a 29 year old diplomat looking to transition into law with a long-term ambition to work in international arbitration.
I have 7 years experience in the public sector including 1 year in the Government Legal Department (non legal role), 6 years at the Foreign Office, with a few months in Rwanda and 18 months in Somalia as a political officer as the highlights. I currently work in a sanctions role.

I'm aware of all of the potential difficulties as a career changer but I actually have concerns over my transcript. I got a 2.1 from UCL in History and Politics (67) but got a couple of sub 2:1 modules in first and second year (2 in each). These were largely econ modules. 1st year was due to me being a lazy dumb student and second year was genuine extenuating circumstances for my final couple exams. The final year was all solid first except a couple 2.1. I'm looking to apply this cycle, targeting mainly firms with end of Dec/Jan deadlines. Got dinged by Clifford Chance (already).

I'd be keen to get a sense from the community here on whether I have a chance at a TC with these academics. I imagine some firms will be particularly hesitant, Magic Circle, US firms? I do have (in my opinion) interesting work experience though which I'd hope would go some way to counter balance.

Separately, I'm aware that I might not get a TC this cycle, but at my big age I don't want to be wasting time. As such, I was debating applying for a Jan 26 part time PGDL alongside my full time work. This would put me on the same timeline as the Sep 28 TC start dates i'm targeting (and I could stomach the costs) but I am unclear if firms will be recruiting for a Sep 28 start date beyond this cycle (i.e. - would my plan to not waste time fail).

Thanks in advance.
  • ✅
Reactions: Andrei Radu

Academic Results

Hello everyone,
I am sure that this is an oft discussed topic but I just wanted to get a specific answer. From 2019-2024, I was dealing with complicated health issues resulting in only predicted A-Levels (A*s and As) and a barely gotten 2:1. I have one condoned fail module and the rest of the results range from 2:2 to high 2:1 - so not great.

I did my PGDL and got a distinction overall and in almost all modules.

Now, with my applications I am just adding mitigating circumstances - although not in too graphic detail and hoping for the best. For Weil, however, they look at academics to see if you are even suitable - any point in applying.

And also how much detail is should I go into for mitigating circumstances. I hate to make it seem like I am whining but also till this day I am dealing with medications, wait lists etc. and doctors still don't know exactly what was wrong so I just say 'chronic illness' and 'hospital stays'.

Any help/advice would be much appreciated! Thank you. :)
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

Recording My UK Legal Work Experiences #JLaw

Heya!
I've started my internship at a boutique law firm and it has been a really good learning experience and I would like to journal them here!

Please feel free to DM me if you wanna know anything in detail about the things I share here, happy to have discuss.

It's just a one month internship with the potential for extension. Let's see how it goes.
  • 🤝
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

Linking back to vacation scheme in covering letter?

Currently writing a covering letter. I find myself every few sentences saying something like '...and I want to explore this during the scheme' or 'this is why I want to do the scheme'... Feels like I am repeating myself and wasting words but if I don't say it I feel a bit like I'm just listing a bunch of facts that don't really have a clear relevance to the application (even though it should be fairly easy to infer). Does anyone have any advice here? Should you keep linking back to the scheme? If so, is there a less boring way to do it? Thanks so much!
  • ✅
Reactions: Andrei Radu

Which Law Firm is right for me?

Hi everyone,

This is my first cycle applying to law firms and I am interested in medical negligence and personal injury law, family law and sports law.
I'm still doing my research, and wanted to ask if there are any law firms which spring to mind that practice in these areas which I should not miss out applying for?

I'm also really interested in one day specialising in public inquiries, as I've always been so interested in high-profile government investigations (e.g., Grenfell, Covid-19 Inquiry, Manchester Arena). Although I don't know if this is an area of law specifically or how to get into this?

I've already applied to Irwin Mitchell so far and waiting to hear back from my online test/VI.

Thanks for your help!

How many cycles before giving up?

Hi everyone, it's my 5th cycle with only 1 AC to show for all 5 years and I was wondering when it would be time to give up? Surely firms will think there's something wrong with me if they realise I've submitted failed applications to them for the last 4 years in a row, or that my profile shows I've obviously been aiming for TCs for years without succeeding?

Module Results Question (How Detrimental)

Hi! I’m applying for vacation schemes and training contracts, and I have a question regarding academic disclosure. During the first year of my engineering degree, I failed two modules (Mathematical Analysis and Engineering something). However, after changing my major to law from my second year onwards, I graduated with an average score of 89 in my LLB degree (in another country). I then completed an LLM in the UK and obtained a Distinction.

I’m wondering whether I need to disclose those failed modules (I have done so) and whether they are likely to significantly affect my chances, for example, by leading to an automatic filter.

Thanks! I'd really appreciate any input.
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

International Degree Grades

Hi! I’m applying for vacation schemes and training contracts, and I have a question regarding academic disclosure. During the first year of my engineering degree, I failed two modules (Mathematical Analysis and Engineering something). However, after changing my major to law from my second year onwards, I graduated with an average score of 89 in my LLB degree (in another country). I then completed an LLM in the UK and obtained a Distinction.

I’m wondering whether I need to disclose those failed modules (I have done so) and whether they are likely to significantly affect my chances, for example, by leading to an automatic filter.

Thanks! I'd really appreciate any input.

Do firms ask for school transcripts or just Uni?

Hi All! I’m an international candidate and have ACs with two law firms in the UK, one of them with a MC which does not have A Level requirements. My school transcripts are in the native language while university ones are in English and translation services are steep here. Just wanted to know if firms during academic verification ask for school transcripts as well, so I can arrange for timely translations. Would be grateful for any advice, thanks! @Ram Sabaratnam @Andrei Radu @Amma Usman

How to explain using AI in applications

A recurrent question a number of firms have been asking this cycle which applicants have struggled with is: how have you used generative AI when preparing your application to the firm?

To help you write a good answer here, I think it is firstly important to clarify that the "How did you use AI" question does not have a clear right and wrong answer. Instead, it appears the point of the question is for the firm to test your commercial awareness regarding AI tech and to see if you can come up with a well-considered explanation as to what particular usage of AI best fits your working style, goals, and skillset when making your application. Thus, a multitude of different substantive answers could be well-received by a graduate recruiter here, and you should not worry too much if you think you have used AI more restrictively or more expansively than most other applicants.

To give some examples of how different uses of AI could be described well, from least to most expansive:
  1. Not using generative AI at all: While many candidates shy away from saying this so as not to appear to have an excessively conservative attitude towards new technology, this is not an unacceptable answer to give if the candidate explains their reasoning and attitude well. To illustrate the lines of thinking the candidate may use, consider: "While I consider generative AI tools to have huge potential benefits in cost-savings and improving the efficiency of work product, and while I would embrace the opportunity to use such tools as a trainee solicitor, I have decided not to use generative AI in the process of applying to commercial law firms. Firstly, this is because going through the process myself develops valuable skills: drafting skills when writing and re-writing answers myself, critical analysis and attention to detail skills when reviewing these answers, and researching skills when trying to understand the firm's work and practices. Secondly, I have chosen this because I believe that expansive use of generative AI could lead to my application losing its personal touch, which would make it more difficult for the firm to truly assess my candidacy. While I appreciate that using generative AI could have enabled me to finish this work quicker, I consider that, overall, the benefits of developing the aforementioned skills and of submitting a tailored application are greater."
  2. Using AI tech (such as Grammarly) only to check spelling and grammar: An answer along the same lines could work very well here vis-a-vis why you chose not to use AI for the purposes bellow; but here, you could explain that checking spelling and grammar by using an AI tool first, and only then checking it yourself, enables you to both decrease chances of any errors remaining (as two review tools are better than one) and to decrease the amount of time this task takes you.
  3. Using AI tech to find better ways to structure content or to cut word count form your lengthier sections: The same applies here, only you would explain that AI tools are very good at offering suggestions for a clear writing structure and for helping you express your points in a more concise manner. You could add that while you would have perhaps developed these writing skills by struggling with the content on your own, AI accelerates your learning: instead of having to re-invent the wheel, AI can quickly show you patterns of what works and what doesn't, which you then internalise and naturally begin integrating when writing on your own.
  4. Using AI for firm research, or for understanding commercial topics: Here, you could again explain that although researching the firm and commercial topics on your own is useful and develops valuable skills, you believe AI enables you to (i) develop the same skills and commercial understanding in a more efficient manner, (ii) allows you to cover a way wider breadth of material in your research, and (iii) by saving you more time, gives you an opportunity to deepen your understanding to a level of detail you would have been unable to otherwise (e.g. you can give examples of discussions with an AI tool about complex financial concepts and structures that would have taken you way too long to research manually).
  5. Using AI tech to scrutinise and improve your substantive writing by redrafting your work: Here, you could explain that just as AI can make for a great teaching tool in terms of the structure of your writing and to help with your understanding of commercial topics, it can also help you learn how to improve the substance of your writing. By asking a chatbot to scrutinise your answers, you could quickly learn about problematic patters in parts of your answers such as insufficient specificity or a lack of contextualised evidence to support your claims. Understanding these mistakes early improves your ability to write well thought out answers without having to go through a lengthy trial and error process, which increases your chances of success and also improves the firm's ability to assess your candidacy on its true merits.
As you can see, a wide variety of different substantive answers about use of AI can work - the only potentially straight-up "wrong" answer here would be if one said they had an AI bot write their entire application and/or come up with most of their core substantive points, as firms are interested to see how you generally write and what you think about the topics they are asking about. Save for that, you do not need to construct an answers based on what you would perceive to be an "objectively optimal" response rather than an honest one. Instead, what is key and what I would highly encourage you to do is to be very specific about how exactly you used AI. Beyond explaining your reasoning for a specific usage, as shown, you should try to elaborate on how you have used it; and, the more granular you can be, the better! For example, rather than saying 'I used AI to brainstorm ideas', it would be better to say, 'I used ChatGPT to help me to understand how X's sponsor-led practice would differentiate the firm from a commercial perspective and why this is a factor worth considering when choosing a firm to apply to. This helped me to further confirm my interest in the firm and to better communicate a point I had been thinking about in relation to why X would be different to their competitors.'

TC Holder preparing for PGDL

Hello!

I've just finished my English degree at Oxford, graduating with a First. I'm taking a year off before starting the PGDL at BPP (and then eventually joining Freshfields as a trainee solicitor).

I've been living at home and working to save money for travelling, but I'd also like to prepare for the PGDL as much as possible. Does anyone have any recommendations? Thank you :)

Very worried, what should I do to compensate for A*BB in A levels?

Currently on a gap year with deferred entry to UCL, non law subject.
A*BBB in A Levels, with A* in maths achieved one year early (2024) and BBB achieved in 2025.
I am worried this will limit my future prospects in securing training contracts at magic circle firms / pupillages.
I would like to retake, do firms mind retakes?
What should I do in the meantime to strengthen my applications in the future?

'Why commercial law?' in interviews

How would you recommend answering this question in an interview context with a partner. Some resources recommend a narrative structure, showing a journey to get to a place of applying for the firm. However, others recommend 2-3 reasons. My caution with the latter is I could see this coming across robotic and also jumping around in time a lot, but I can see the benefits in making my answer clear. Any help would be much appreciated - have a big interview on Tuesday for a vacation scheme!
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

QWE Paralegal roles in London beginning in January?

Hi all. I've just finished my SQE2 exams. I'm really keen to secure a QWE paralegal role in London beginning in January. I have 4 vac schemes on my CV and other commercial experience. The recruiters I've talked to so far haven't been that helpful. I'm flexible about the area, as long as it's QWE in London. Can anyone give me any advice, e.g. on recruiters, agencies, how to secure a role? Any advice is much appreciated, thanks!

How is this work experience section

Can someone please review my work experiences for the application. There is no word limit. Please be brutally honest!

1-As a client executive intern, I coordinated with the receptionist to manage front-desk operations. I scheduled appointments and assisted with clients’ concerns post-treatment. I maintained over 100 patient records in the clinic’s database and supported documentation for insurance claims.

My role also required a high degree of adaptability. For example, a wellness influencer came to the clinic, and she expressed concerns about pricing. I empathised with her and assured her I would discuss with my manager. After researching her online presence to understand her reach and potential value, I consulted with my manager. I successfully negotiated a 15 percent discount in exchange for three stories on her Instagram account of the clinic. This resulted in a favourable Google review about my customer service. I learned the value of tailoring communication to different client needs and enjoyed the client-facing nature of the internship as I interacted with clients from diverse backgrounds.

I also led the initiative to organise the clinic’s outreach stall at Alserkal Avenue. I introduced our services to potential clients and designed a raffle with a detox program as the prize. The raffle led to 20+ people visiting the stall, and the campaign directly resulted in a 5 percent increase in clinic sales for January.

2) I spent one month in the legal department at DP World. I assisted the team during the tender processes for three port concession projects. For example, I proofread a 70-page concession agreement within a two-day deadline, ensuring that critical terms such as exclusivity rights and liability caps were correctly defined. I developed an insight into construction and infrastructure regulations in the GCC region.

I also enjoyed reviewing DP World’s sponsorship agreement for the Dubai Sail Grand Prix. Since the other party drafted the contract, I scrutinised the agreement to identify any terms that deviated from DP World’s standard provisions. I flagged potentially onerous clauses, including one that imposed unusual obligations on the company. Highlighting this gave the team a valuable new angle for negotiations.

In addition, I researched the feasibility of initiating a civil debt litigation claim in Cyprus. I analysed the litigation process, timelines, recoverability, and the appeal process, and condensed my findings into a concise report for a senior partner. Finally, I kept the team’s internal sanctions list up to date by researching the latest OFAC and EU sanctions. I managed multiple assignments simultaneously, demonstrating my ability to prioritise and organise effectively under pressure.
3) I completed a two-week summer internship at a family office. I worked on a large-scale infrastructure deal that involved a public-private partnership in Africa.

My main task was to proofread the conservation agreement and flag potential legal risks for the investor. As this was a project aimed at generating carbon credits, I was interested in the financial and ESG regulations that impact this emerging field. Through this work, I proactively identified the long-term risk of increased costs if the project took longer than expected to generate profits. To address this, I researched mitigating measures, discovering the ‘step-in right clause’, which ensures lenders can intervene to reassign the project to protect their investment. I presented a PowerPoint to the legal team, summarising my findings from relevant precedents and legislation.

Additionally, I reviewed three operation and maintenance agreements, key documents in project financing deals, to ensure all parties’ information was accurately and consistently recorded. This required me to cross-check addresses, company registration numbers and directors’ information of the investor, the lenders, and the project operator.

4)-I spent two weeks as a summer intern in the Asset Finance team, working on a high-value aircraft sale and purchase agreement. My work involved reviewing the sale and purchase agreement, letters of credit, and security documents. I ensured that all client and firm details were accurately recorded, flagging inconsistencies across the documents. Additionally, I took detailed minutes of meetings between associates and helped a trainee update the conditions precedent checklist.

I also contributed to a senior partner’s article on hedge fund regulation in the UAE financial free zones. I researched UAE federal laws regarding mainland and economic free trade zones and synthesised numerical data from over 10 financial reports of companies. Moreover, I effectively absorbed large amounts of legal and numerical information from 20-page year-end reports and condensed it into a one-page summary with visual charts for the senior partner.

Furthermore, as part of a legal tech pilot, I used AI tools, like Luminance and LawGeex, to review an archive of over 20 historic aircraft purchase agreements. I extracted and analysed key standard clauses, successfully identifying minor misalignments that the team used to strengthen the risk review process for the live transaction.

5) I worked as a part-time student, two days a week, at a fintech, where I handled vendor onboarding and due diligence. I conducted due diligence on over 50 vendors using specialised platforms like World-Check and Refinitiv, assessing financial, regulatory and criminal risks. I learnt how a detailed legal review of a vendor’s risk profile is critical to partner with new vendors.

When the team encountered critical errors in our vendor contract data during migration to a new procurement software, I took personal responsibility to resolve the issue. Using my initiative, I created a centralised contract archive that tracked the status of all agreements and established a clear hierarchy of master and subordinate agreements.

Over three months, I meticulously built this archive, extracting key information like renewal terms, expirations, and the nature of each agreement from over 700 legal contracts, which strengthened my attention to detail. This involved me collaborating with the data privacy and compliance teams to obtain information about data processing agreements. This archive streamlined the contract management process and reduced contract handling time by 20 percent. My focus on efficiency and technology integration makes me eager to explore Vario at Pinsent Masons.
Would love your thoughts!

Order by:

Find member