@Jessica Could you please provide insight into how Amberjack SJTs are usually assessed by grad rec teams. Am I correct in understanding that firms would have a benchmark cut-off for each pillar, and then also look at your overall score across all the pillars? Because it seems like it’s impossible to score close to 6/7 in every pillar (9 being the maximum), as by selecting some answers you gain score in one pillar but inevitably lose score in another.
Thank you very much in advance.
I don’t know this specific detail unfortunately. Only Amberjack and the firm would really be able to advise on this.
There is likely to be a system that creates individual benchmarks for the pillars, numerical and verbal reasoning assessments, and then possibly an overall benchmark too that might be calculated with different weighting attached to the individual elements.
If it helps, I don’t think I have ever seen a perfect score in a SJT. Also, benchmarks for SJTs tend to be fairly low. It’s usually about removing the candidates who regularly choose the “wrong” options as the strongest rather the having to get 75-80% of questions “right” - it’s more about eliminating the “wrong”.
But given this is also factoring in numerical and verbal reasoning too, its difficult to give accuracy on what is being assessed, what may be weighted more, and what the firm’s benchmarks are.