Hi
@Andrei Radu @Amma Usman,
I’m re-applying to
Gibson Dunn this cycle after reaching the AC last year and would really appreciate your advice.
I’ve re-written my “why commercial law” paragraph and fully refreshed my first “why
Gibson Dunn” paragraph.
My question is about my two other reasons for wanting to join the firm: the disputes/transactions balance, and the training philosophy. My reasoning on those hasn’t changed — so is it acceptable to keep those broadly the same this year, or is that still too risky even if I lightly rephrase?
Separately, my final “why me” paragraph is currently focused on my university research achievement and my society leadership roles (I graduated two years ago). Should I keep the research award and add a recent achievement to show progression — or would you replace it entirely?
Would really appreciate your thoughts. I thought last year’s application was strong and I’d like to keep elements of it this year if I can.