• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • Office Hours with BCLP (Live Q&A)
    17 December 2025 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK) Hosted on TCLA TV
    Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!

    📺 View Event →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

opticskibidi

Active Member
Jan 29, 2025
10
44
I don't want to sound like a doomer, but I've recently come to the realisation that the content of our application answers doesn't matter. These answers often just act as a filter for the other parts of your candidate profile.

Obviously I can't share these but, I have an old friend's successful applications from his second year of university. Trust me when I tell you that he essentially copy/pasted the exact same application for every firm he applied to – even down to using the same adjective for each of these firm's cultures. They were absolutely indistinguishable. However, this guy was on track to getting a first, he held multiple executive (society) positions, and he had also secured a large number of first-year schemes. If anybody else had written those applications, they would have been binned. But, his candidate profile was genuinely so impressive that (in my opinion) firms were willing to look past the lack of substance in his application answers.

I disagree with this. I have had roughly the same experiences and extracurriculars as in my previous cycles. What truly made the difference for me was sitting down and telling a story in my applications. I gave recruiters a break from all the AI-generated content they read and showed them who I am through my experiences, and why those make me a strong fit.


I do think it’s crucial to gain experiences and participate in extracurriculars to a certain extent, but mainly to help you answer questions like ‘why commercial law?’, or ‘what do you bring to x firm?’ on the application form.


Changing my style led to a considerable shift: I went from 26 straight first-stage rejections to, so far this cycle, progressing in 6 out of 8 applications and even reaching an assessment centre at a US firm. It’s all about mentality. Once you change the way you approach applications, that’s when you start progressing.

Keep it up, we’re all in this together!

P.S. I’m not an Oxbridge student with 10 first-year schemes; I go to a non-target RG and did one first-year scheme. I have worked in fast food and retail since I was 16, though.
 

Harvey Specter

Legendary Member
Jul 4, 2024
764
2,811
LMAO I'm flying the night before (like the night of the 17th) so I'm gonna be abslutely wrecked haha - I'm not too sure what to expect with this either? I thought they'd give some more information in the email but apparently not 😭
Me neither tbh I’ve not done one of these before and the time to prep for it is baso non-existent so I’m just gna hope n pray for the best atp. 🥲​
 

Madison Pinewall

Star Member
Dec 12, 2025
26
45
This is definitely a tendency at firms like Skadden or to some extent, maybe even all firms. Sometimes application answers don’t get much attention or their flaws are overlooked because a candidate is so impressive that grad rec just doesn’t care (tbf I wouldn’t care about your alternative career choice if you graduated top of your cohort in Cambridge law either…) - but based on my personal experience, this is not the rule and tailoring answers still matters a lot in general. I’ve gone through a whole cycle of applying to 30+ firms with untailored, generic answers and barely progressed post application stage, while this year I have a strategy, understand how firms are different, submit extremely tailored application, and already see success.

This said, firms are soo random sometimes, I’ve made it to interview with SC and US firms with applications that were retrospectively, mid at best, probably cause the person reading mine saw something that other firms didn’t. Or that specific firm was looking for my kind of profile more than other firms. Or it was pure luck. The point is we can never know for sure but as long as you try your best and put in the effort you know you have to, and you have a clear strategy and idea of where you want to work, you’ll succeed! (Provided that you meet minimum academic criteria)
A guy I know with top grades from Oxford Law just got rejected from Skadden soooo...
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.