Ok thank you!Hey!
I would say that it really comes down to who you are writing to and what the exercise is testing. In most written exercises in an AC, if you are advising a client, it is usually better to prioritise writing in clear and plain English (i.e. what the clause does and why it matters commercially), rather than heavily referencing clause numbers. The assessors will often be looking at your ability to translate legal drafting into clear practical advice for clients.
However, I don't think there is anything wrong with briefly anchoring your point to the agreement were helpful (e.g. referring to the "termination clause") or being more precise if you are writing for someone internally.
I'd say a good balance is to explain the effect (+ any risks) in straightforward terms first, and then refer to the clause if it adds any clarity or helps identify it
-
Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
-
TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.Join →
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
- Thread starter Ram Sabaratnam
- Start date
I do think it's automatic, or else they check if you're eligible etc. but I received my test invite a day after I applied (for the VS)
There's no VI, it was just the standard cappfinity and then critical thinking I believe.
Hey!
For this question, I would approach it in two clear stages - first define what you are genuinely looking for in your legal career, and then link each of those points directly to something specific about the firm.
In the first point, make sure that you use genuine and concrete examples of what you are looking for. Instead of saying things such as "high-quality work" or "a challenging environment" (which could be seen as quite generic), you could discuss things such as early responsibility, sector specialism, or a collaborative environment where you can work with lots of different people. You can then frame this around the kind of lawyer you want to become (e.g. technically excellent or commercially minded).
Then, for the second part, show how the firm would be the best place to achieve that. This is where you need to show that you have researched the firm and understand its strengths - you could reference its training style, client base, culture, or particular practice area strengths. Just make sure to draw a clear line between your long-term development goals and what the firm actually offers, rather than discussing the two separately.
A simple structure for this might look like: "I am looking for X because I want to become Y. A firm like [Firm] would support this because of Z".
Best of luck!
I JUST GOT MY FIRST VAC SCHEME!!!
Thank you so much to everyone for all their support on here, I really didn't think this wld happen, especially not after 4 post AC rejections
As everyone says, it really just takes one yes and I believe in all of u and hope the good news comes soon for u guys too
Thank you so much to everyone for all their support on here, I really didn't think this wld happen, especially not after 4 post AC rejections
As everyone says, it really just takes one yes and I believe in all of u and hope the good news comes soon for u guys too
Congratulations !!!! I saw your previous post about struggling with the rejections so very happy you got a VS!!!
thank you so much, this is extremely helpful!Hey!
For this question, I would approach it in two clear stages - first define what you are genuinely looking for in your legal career, and then link each of those points directly to something specific about the firm.
In the first point, make sure that you use genuine and concrete examples of what you are looking for. Instead of saying things such as "high-quality work" or "a challenging environment" (which could be seen as quite generic), you could discuss things such as early responsibility, sector specialism, or a collaborative environment where you can work with lots of different people. You can then frame this around the kind of lawyer you want to become (e.g. technically excellent or commercially minded).
Then, for the second part, show how the firm would be the best place to achieve that. This is where you need to show that you have researched the firm and understand its strengths - you could reference its training style, client base, culture, or particular practice area strengths. Just make sure to draw a clear line between your long-term development goals and what the firm actually offers, rather than discussing the two separately.
A simple structure for this might look like: "I am looking for X because I want to become Y. A firm like [Firm] would support this because of Z".
Best of luck!
Received Slaughter and May first year open day invite) They stated in the email that they have now gotten back to all first years, so I am assuming they will be onto the other applications from tomorrow
) They stated in the email that they have now gotten back to all first years, so I am assuming they will be onto the other applications from tomorrowCongrats!! And thank you, helpful to knowReceived Slaughter and May first year open day invite
Congrats which firm/ uk or us firm if u don’t mind me asking
For the people wondering about Sidley … grad requirement is in the middle of seat switches for current trainees! I imagine that will be their priority for the next few days.
Still looking for insight on the Stephenson Harwood VI, for a friend! Happy to assist with whatever (eg Jones Day AC, Latham AC, White & Case interviews), as well as give feedback & tips if that would be helpful.
Which US firms have the best outcomes for direct TC? For example I know last year HL didn’t even reply to people for direct TC. Thinking of Morgan Lewis and W&C but could anyone let me know if there are any others??
I think Baker McKenzie is pretty good. My mate did their DTC AC last year got an offer and said that apps they took c30-50% from the DTC route.
Firms like Paul Hastings, King & Spalding and Fried Frank only hire via the DTC route (12, 4 and 4 TCs respectively). Idk about other US firms though.
Firms like Paul Hastings, King & Spalding and Fried Frank only hire via the DTC route (12, 4 and 4 TCs respectively). Idk about other US firms though.
For bakers, I was rejected post SJT this cycle. Am I able to apply for DTC do you reckon?
Similar threads
- Sticky
