Sorry to hear that hope you’re okay. Is this post VI?CRS Guildford PFO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry to hear that hope you’re okay. Is this post VI?CRS Guildford PFO
Can I ask if this was for DTC or vac scheme and for what office?CRS PFO![]()
Hey!Hi @Abbie Whitlock
Thanks for your previous reply re the law reform question of mine
I just want to ask about the link to the firm or TC role at the end of answering a question.
For commercial awareness questions, how can I explicitly link that to the firm, clients, TC role etc?
For the why do you want to be a solicitor or why our firm questions, what can I do to link my experience/ answer content with the firm/clients/sector/TC role etc?
Thanks
Sorry only just saw this - yeah that makes sense, I do use bullet points but I think the issue is overly name dropping or not illustrating with examples strongly enough. But at the same time, the risk is that if you veer away from rehearsing then you will miss key commercial insight which one person may think is excellent but another may label as 'buzzword'. Seems quite a subjective thing in my opinion.the "buzz words" comment and "over-rehearsed" point more at the form of the answers than their content
probably means that you sound like you have written down the answers to the questions before word-for-word - including all the buzz-words, that normally people do not really include in speech. While structure, flow, and comand of technical terms/buzz words is important, if it is "too perfect" it sounds unnatural.
This is a problem for four main reasons:
- may seem not genuine - everyone is able to memorise a couple of lines and buzz words, which helps if you do not actually mean it
- does not show real communication skills that lawyers need - rarely do you find a situation where you can rehearse exactly what you are going to say
- its is overall unnatural, which "feels wrong" - in the same way as if you were reciting birthday wishes using plenty sophisticated words that you never actually use
The goal should probably be to show that you have thought about what you were going to say, not exactly how you were going to say it (beyond maybe some structure).
To improve I would do exactly that - plan with bullet points, not paragraphs.
I honestly would do the scheme. I think it’s important to train at a firm where you’re genuinely interested in the sectors/practice areas they have on offer as this really sets the trajectory for your career. You can move afterwards if you wish but definitely prioritise training over money at this stage.Hey everyone,
So I'm in a really really fortunate position, but I'm still feeling conflicted. I've received a TC offer from a pretty good firm!!! So so grateful, but I also have a 2 week vacation scheme coming up in a couple of weeks.
The firm I have a TC offer from while really good, doesn't do some of the practice areas or sector areas I am really interested in. The vac scheme firm is close to a dream firm for me in terms of the above, even though it's slightly lower paying. I would definitely take that TC over my current should I be successful. In a perfect world i'd definitely do the scheme and see how it goes (I may not even get the offer, I believe conversion is around 50%). However, my dissertation is due right around the end of the scheme, and I'm feeling behind with it. In theory, I don't need to do THAT well in my diss to get a 2:1, having looked at grade calculators using my achieved module grades. But feels like gambling valuable time.
I'm really conflicted, I would love to do the scheme but it's a lot of time and money. I know at the end of the day it is up to me and I have to weigh everything up, but just wondering if anybody has been in a similar position or has any specific advice?
Vac scheme for the London officeCan I ask if this was for DTC or vac scheme and for what office?
Anybody still waiting on Freshfields after being waitlisted?
Feels like waiting for a response from a risky text (probably)
No but I’m 100% certain they’ll do that by email tomorrow. They made VS offers covering all their three schemes by phone this morning and I’m certain that will have been it. But - hope for both our sakes I’m wrong.Has anyone been PFOd by Forsters? Trying to figure out whether no news is bad or good news