😂😂😂😂😂😂Haha!
The combination of text speak and people who want to be lawyers who love a good acronym!
It means “Please f**k off”
Means a rejection but people have used this term to almost refer to it in a light hearted way or a quick rejection.
😂😂😂😂😂😂Haha!
The combination of text speak and people who want to be lawyers who love a good acronym!
It means “Please f**k off”
Means a rejection but people have used this term to almost refer to it in a light hearted way or a quick rejection.
Lol I was like that when I first joined TCLA. Had to Google it to find out what it meant 🤣🤣🤣On that note, what is PFO? Assume it means rejection but what do the letters stand for 😂
Not necessary to provide this detail for each charity. But for instance, you might want to highlight the ones you raised the most money for (an approximation is fine) or the charity fundraising you are most proud of (and explain why, rather than focusing on how much you raised). Specific detail is important - it’s what will make your application form more unique than everyone else who also mentions volunteering on their application. But it doesn’t always have to be the outcome (eg money raised) that makes your individual experiences impressive.So I am writing this personal statement for a firm, and I have done various volunteering over the years from high school (which I wouldn't normally include but it is more to show this is a long standing passion of mine) to the present day for different charities. Do I need to specify how much was raised for each charity? Because I'm not sure I can remember 😂 I barely remember what I did yesterday! 🤣
Not necessary to provide this detail for each charity. But for instance, you might want to highlight the ones you raised the most money for (an approximation is fine) or the charity fundraising you are most proud of (and explain why, rather than focusing on how much you raised). Specific detail is important - it’s what will make your application form more unique than everyone else who also mentions volunteering on their application. But it doesn’t always have to be the outcome (eg money raised) that makes your individual experiences impressive.
I don't know if you'll already be familiar with it, but this thread is a great resource for looking at VI's and may help you do a retrospective critique.Further to the lovely end-of-week PFO from Howard Kennedy, I'd like to know a bit more about what is required to succeed during a VI.
In the 4 I've done so far, I passed 1 and failed 3. I'm not sure what I did wrong during the ones I failed and unfortunately, no feedback was provided. Maybe @Jessica Booker you would have an idea as to what they are after? Thanks
Thank you Jacob, I wasn't familiar with the thread but will definitely look at it now!I don't know if you'll already be familiar with it, but this thread is a great resource for looking at VI's and may help you do a retrospective critique.
I would suggest not to be too discouraged, though - VI's are one of the most brutal filtering stages in my experience, and generally have a rather low success rate given the way they're used with most firms. To that end, the fact that you've had a successful conversion would indicate that you're not miles away from where you need to be.
I really want to know too! I find VI’s extremely unnatural and for some reason they throw me off even if the questions are easy. Not sure how to do well 😭Further to the lovely end-of-week PFO from Howard Kennedy, I'd like to know a bit more about what is required to succeed during a VI.
In the 4 I've done so far, I passed 1 and failed 3. I'm not sure what I did wrong during the ones I failed and unfortunately, no feedback was provided. Maybe @Jessica Booker you would have an idea as to what they are after? Thanks
Nope, not yetHas anyone heard back post the verbal reasoning test for the legal trainee scheme with the GLP?
which office did you apply for?Fieldfisher are really slacking. It has been over a month and I still haven’t heard back post them online tests, and their turnaround time is within 14 working days😡😡
That is fine - lots of law firms like evidence of you sticking to things. We used to call it "stickability" at Freshfields.The one I raised the most with and I am most proud of is the one during highschool. I am 23 now so I wasn't really wanting to use it for anything more than showing it is something I have enjoyed doing for a long time. Is it still okay to use this one as a specific example? My other one I am especially proud of is that I am a Mind Mental Health Campaigner but I haven't managed to do a whole lot for that as of late due to COVID (I'd normally do bake sales etc which aren't viable right now), so I haven't got as much to write about.
Just got rejected. On TSR a lot of people received their CRT invite about 20 mins agoHas anyone heard back post the verbal reasoning test for the legal trainee scheme with the GLP?
 
 