Thank you so much! Another question i had was relating to tailored my reasons for why this firm. During my previous interview i gave two main reasons as my interest and n the firm: their strength and excellence in a practice area which i linked back to a module i took in dispute resolution and mooting, as well as their smaller intake which i linked back to my past experience in customer service working in similar smaller groups with high responsibility. I also talked abt a conversation i had with a current trainee and linked it back to why what they said was important to me and why i liked it (again, talking abt my work experience which aligned with).I personally wouldn’t spend too long researching interviewers, especially if you are going to have so many of them.
Your interview is about you, it’s not about them. If you find things uou are naturally interested in that the partners have worked on, then I would focus on these aspects rather than trying to understand everything they do/have done. You can then adapt your questions at the end to your natural/genuine motivations rather than trying to set up questions you think are relevant to them. The questions need to be relevant to your interests first.
I’ll bet now that at least one of the interviewers will change/no show anyway!
During my feedback call, grad rec mentioned that the interviewers felt i didnt quite convey my interest in the firm enough and that it was a little too general. I couldnt ask exzctly what they meant by that or what i said that conveyed this. Would you have advice on how to improve in the next stage, especially since i feel like that my reasons for why the firm were quite well linked to the firm and me?