• WIN: Lunch with Willkie Trainees!
    15 Oct 2025 5:00 pm – 6:00 pm (UK) Zoom (registration required)
    Put your knowledge of Willkie Farr & Gallagher to the test in this interactive quiz session. The winner will enjoy lunch with Willkie trainees!
    Register on Zoom →
  • Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

ZNadeem

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Premium Member
Forum Team
Mar 16, 2025
180
178
Hi,
I’m struggling a bit with reapplying to firms and would love some advice! When firms ask the same application questions, I sometimes feel that my previous answers from previous applications, which were successful, are still the strongest and most authentic. For example, HSF Kramer has a question about a topic that interests you. I’ve drafted answers on new topics, but honestly, the one I like most (and feel is most “me”) is the one I submitted before. I’m unsure whether reusing it is a good idea. I know that for motivational or competency-based questions, I can update my answers with new experiences since my last application, while keeping the core motivations the same. But for certain questions, I feel my previous answer was already strong, and I’m not sure if changing it is the right move. Any thoughts on this would be extremely helpful! Thanks

Hi! I’d say trust your instincts — if your previous answer genuinely feels like the strongest and most authentic, it’s perfectly fine to reuse the topic and core personal elements. That said, it’s worth updating the structure and reflection to show growth and ensure the answer reads as polished and purposeful. Even small tweaks can make a big difference, especially if your previous answer was more narrative than reflective.


A structure I usually recommend for that HSFK question is:

  1. Introduce the topic with context – briefly explain what the topic is and why it matters.
  2. Explain your personal connection – show why it genuinely interests you.
  3. Reflect and round off.

This approach allows you to retain the authenticity of your original answer while demonstrating thoughtfulness, reflection, and growth. It also ensures your answer is structured and easy for recruiters to follow, rather than just a personal narrative.
 

ZNadeem

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Premium Member
Forum Team
Mar 16, 2025
180
178
Is rounding up/down module results to the nearest whole number common practice? (Ie. 62.30 -> 62 or 64.75 -> 65)

Hi! If it’s your overall grade, it’s generally fine to round to the nearest whole number — for example, 62.3% can be listed as 62% and 64.75% as 65%. I personally did this throughout my applications and CVs to various firms.

However, if it’s the mark for a single module, I’d recommend keeping the exact figure (e.g., 62.3%) rather than rounding. Firms sometimes look at individual module marks for context, and providing the precise number ensures transparency. It also avoids any potential confusion if your transcript shows a slightly different figure.
 

BillSikes

Legendary Member
Premium Member
Feb 16, 2024
344
373
Hi! I'd like to apply for HSF Kramer's vac scheme. I see they require consistent 2.1s across all undergrad modules but one of my modules in 1st year got a 2.2 and so did a module in my 2nd year (this year in particular was impacted by internet disruptions during lockdown). This makes 2 modules with a 2.2. The rest are a mix of 2.1s and firsts. Should I still apply? I've heard during interviews we might get asked why we got certain grades.
Where heave you seen this?
 

londonlawyer

Distinguished Member
Dec 17, 2024
54
50
Please tell us something that not many people know about you. (max 250 words) - any advice on how to answer this? Especially as they've given 250 words and I'm unsure how to make the most of it
I would say focus on an extracurricular activity/interest that you can clearly write about. I know the wording 'not many people know about you' is tricky, but I focused on a niche extracurricular activity and how I developed certain skills and was able to make an impact. I was successful in getting that firm's VS last year.

I know of fellow vac schemers who wrote about a specific interest in a subject, which they independently researched and wrote about their findings.

Hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bh.sa

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
216
173
Please tell us something that not many people know about you. (max 250 words) - any advice on how to answer this? Especially as they've given 250 words and I'm unsure how to make the most of it
Hello!

Just to add to @londonlawyer's really great advice, I think what the firm is looking for is a short and memorable insight into who you are beyond the obvious things on your CV or application.

A good approach is to pick something that:
  • Isn't common knowledge about you (a quirky skill, unusual hobby, formative experience, or a personal value that you find important);
  • Reveals a bit about your personality or what motivates you; or
  • Could spark curiosity or conversation if someone read it aloud in an interview.
In a previous application that I completed that had a similar question, I discussed my interest in trains and the London Underground, and how I enjoyed learning more about the subject through various experiences (which I then outlined). It doesn't have to something that is directly applicable to law or the business world, but you should use the question to show your passion and dedication to something that you are genuinely interested in (and link transferable skills where you can) :)

I'd try not to overthink it too much, as the firm is just trying to learn more about you - pick an interest / trait that feels authentic and makes you you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh.sa

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
216
173
For HSF, the winter deadline is 1st Oct. Does anyone know if I have until 1st Oct to complete the psych test. It says I have 7 days from when I submit my application but not too sure if the 1st Oct deadline also applies to this?
Hello!

Without seeing the exact wording of the email, I can't say for certain - however, if the email states that you have 7 days from your submission to complete it, I would assume it is fine to complete the test past the application deadline (unless another part of the email implies otherwise).

It might be worth emailing graduate recruitment first thing if you are still unsure and wanted to double-check, and they can hopefully advise before the deadline :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: zara elles

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.