Unlikely because they're not actually rolling. Well, they explained that they screen on a rolling basis, but aren't rolling because they don't allocate ACs until after the deadline has passed. Considering I'm only going to get the test invite link on Friday, I really hope they haven't decided to fill out all of their AC spots before I even have the chance to do the assessment.To be fair, I did complete it on the 1st November, when it was due (for me) on the 3rd. Perhaps I did it too late, won't ever know aha!
Hello,Stage 1 !
It's a little bit of both tbh - they don't stop reviewing and scoring applications but there is definitely a rolling element for their written exercise because they look at things in chronological order, if that makes sense?Unlikely because they're not actually rolling. Well, they explained that they screen on a rolling basis, but aren't rolling because they don't allocate ACs until after the deadline has passed. Considering I'm only going to get the test invite link on Friday, I really hope they haven't decided to fill out all of their AC spots before I even have the chance to do the assessment.
I feel for you! I had this issue, their form was awful but I can't remember how I solved it!I have a question: when filling out the Norton Rose Fulbright form (for those using Workday), I am having issues entering my high school name. Also, for the university section, there is no option for 'LLB' when I try to select it; only course titles like 'Law with French Law' are available. Does anyone know how to fill this out?Thanks in advance.
I also have not heard back and I emailed them but no response :/ looks like a big PFOHad anyone heard from Baker McKenzie regarding their Women’s Open Day?
thank you!!I think you’re safe to wait - the OD is next week and applications close this week so you'll hear quickly - OD will help enhance your VS application, particularly as they are VI heavy.
Thanks Abbie! This was a helpful perspective 😊Hello!
I completely get where you're coming from - a lot of people don't have a single "lightbulb moment" that pushed them toward law, and that's honestly very normal! However, I'd say it's best to focus your answer around one specific personal experience, even if your motivation developed gradually. The question specifically asks for "a specific personal experience", so I would say they're looking for you to anchor your answer around a moment or situation that you can describe clearly.
That doesn't mean you need a big "lightbulb moment" - it could just be one experience that represents or crystallised what motivated you to pursue a career in law. For example, something that made you appreciate problem-solving, negotiation, advocacy, or international collaboration - this can be any experience that ties into your wider motivations towards law.
I think it's a great idea to bring in your travels or other broader experiences, I would just try and pick one defining example. For instance, you might choose a moment that stood out in particular - such as an interaction, observation, or situation that sparked your curiosity about how law shapes society, business, or people's lives. You can then explain how that particular experience made you start thinking about law in a more concrete way and influenced what kind of work or environment you see yourself in.
In other words, I would use one experience as the lens through which you show how your motivation developed. That way, your answer stays focused and personal while still reflecting the wider journey that's led you towards a legal career.
I hope that helps, and best of luck with the application!![]()