Does anyone have the link for the linklaters associate panel, would be super grateful if anyone could share for the virtual event at 1pm
Yes one short one!Does the mishcon test have a VI or is it all typing based? Am trying to see if I can do it in the library
Generally, when referring to departments in the sense of broad departments existing in most major firms (i.e. corporate, finance, disputes, tax, etc) you should not capitalise. However, iff you are referring to a department more particular to the firm which has a specific name (i.e. "Technology Transactions Group"), if the firm capitalises it on their website I would advise you to do the same.in applications, do I capitalise departments? Ie. 'I sat with the Dispute resolution team' or would it be dispute resolution?
Thank you so much!Hey, I worked at Venture Capital and Small Investment Banking before which handled hedge fund clients, startup, and family office.
For up-to-date sources, I am following venture capitalists on LinkedIn.
And for data sources like self made vs inheritance millionaire they cited from Voronoi: https://www.voronoiapp.com/money/Self-Made-vs-Inherited-Wealth-5655
Or the outflows and inflows of wealth https://www.voronoiapp.com/wealth/UK-Faces-92B-in-Millionaire-Wealth-Outflows-in-2025--6665
You can also check MSCI, WTO, World Bank for the emerging market trends. Post the due diligence last year, I made a diagram venn below:
Main thing is to be consistent.in applications, do I capitalise departments? Ie. 'I sat with the Dispute resolution team' or would it be dispute resolution?
I believe someone mentioned that they have received one.Has Gibson Dunn sent out interview invites to anyone for Spring?
Hi @Andrei Radu,Hi @FutureTrainee100 I empathise with you and I know how disappointed and disheartened you must be feeling right now, having been in a somewhat similar position. As a fellow international student, I also completely "moved life" here and made a substantial investment in education in hopes of pursuing a successful career in commercial law. At the end of my first application cycle, I ended up with no progressions past the application stage. After also getting very strong academic results, my second cycle started off quite similar to yours, and I was also increasingly feeling like I had to come to terms with the fact that I may simply not be "good enough" or the "right type" for this career. Nonetheless, I persisted and ended up finishing the cycle with 3 TC and 4 VS offers from elite US/MC firms.
My story is also not at all a unique one or full of empty words of motivation - there are many people who have experienced a similar progression. A good friend of mine who I was guiding through the process last year was feeling like he was facing a similar problem, starting their 3rd application cycle worse than the previous two ones with several straight rejections. Of his first 10-15 applications they heard back from, only 2-3 were progressions, which was significantly bellow their prior rate. I advised them to persist, and within the space of a month or so they had several AC invites, while by the end of the cycle they received 7 VS offers.
Now, besides wanting to inspire you not to lose heart and to keep pushing forward, I mentioned these stories because I wanted to give you two concrete pieces of advice, which I think could end up having a substantial impact on your chances of securing a TC:
- Firstly, you should submit many more high-quality applications: an AC progression rate of 3/7 is incredibly high, so the quality of your writing does not seem to be an issue. Nonetheless, in my opinion 7 applications is without any doubt too few to make given how competitive this job market is, even if you are a very qualified candidate. While it may end up working out for some, I would advise you not to go with the "quality over quantity" approach if you want to minimise the impact of luck and maximise success chances. Both me and the friend I mentioned were rejected in 15+ application during our incredibly successful cycles even though we made sure that the writing and research for every firm was high quality. Had we only applied to 7-10 firms, it could have easily been the case we would have ended the cycle with no VSs/TCs. I have written a significantly longer guide elaborating on the cost and benefits of the "numbers game" vs "quality over quantity" approaches and explained what I think is the ideal application strategy, which is to submit as many high quality (albeit perhaps somewhat imperfect) applications as possible (which should result in 15-20 on the lower end) - I would highly encourage you to take a look here.
- Secondly, you may want to refresh your approach to AC preparation: while this is not an issue that you should be very concerned about right now, and while it is possible to have just been unlucky with your 3 prior ACs, my guess is that if there is any part of the application process for which you could improve quality-wise, it is this stage. I would highly encourage you to take a look at the Complete Competency Interview Preparation Guide I wrote here, as it explains in detail the step-by-step approach I took which was successful 4/4 times I implemented it.
It’s for spring/summerCongrats!! Which scheme is this for?