Hi Rory!Hi all, currently working through the HFW vacation scheme application and was wondering how others are approaching the why HFW question in terms of how it differs from its competitors. Obviously, I am aware of their deep sector focus being at the centre of how they operate, but what is the best way to show in how this differs to its competitors like Reed Smith or Stephenson Harwood? For example, if I try emphasise HFW's culture of recruiting from a vast background of industries, Reed Smith typically have done the same thing. Or, is solely recognising how HFW's decision making such as offices in international shipping hubs, hirings or CSR reflects this sector first approach?
Any help would be much appreciated!
Rory.
For the "how HFW differs" part, try thinking beyond just its sector focus and ask how that focus actually shapes the firm's identity. For example, how does building the whole business around a few core industries influence the kind of work trainees do, the client relationships, or even the culture compared to more generalist firms?
It's fine that there's overlap with others such as Reed Smith or Stephenson Harwood - instead of trying to find something totally unique, it might be a helpful to focus on how HFW's sector-driven model combines with other features (such as its global network, particular training style, or size) to create a different feel. If you can explain what the combination means to you personally, and how it helps to make HFW stand out against its competitors, you'll naturally stand out.
I hope that assists!