TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

[Deleted member 38167]

Does anyone know if DLA Piper’s Watsgon Glaser test is sent to all applicants or only those who are progressed past the application stage?

So the process has changed since last year (so I can only comment on last year) but it was only sent to those applicants who progressed past the application stage - I had a friend fail to even get the WG test after applying

 

[AspirationalDream]

Anything from Burges Salmon post-AC?

Still waiting, hoping for good news 🤞🏾

I was told end of this week.

 

[Jennifer2003]

Congrats!! When did you apply?

Sent my application this morning

 

[DavidJC]

Broadly speaking, seeing as both events are next Tue/Wed, respectively, is everyone who applied still waiting to hear back about Davis Polk and Paul, Weiss Nov Open Days?

 

[BobThebIlly]

Hi everyone,

I’m practising the Freshfields preparation materials, including the slider-style SJT questions, and I’m a bit unsure about how to approach them. For example, one question asks: “My best work is when I…” with one extreme being “working with others” and the other being “working on my own”.

In truth, my best work has usually been in group projects, so I put the slider around 80% towards the “working with others” side. Is this the right approach? I never pass these tests and I’m not sure how people get through them. Any advice would be appreciated!

 

[e_turbo2]

Well done!! Do you mind me asking what your SJT strengths/weaknesses were please?

Thanks! Strengths: credibility, pride, critical reasoning. Weaknesses: self sufficient/individual impact. Wbu?

 

[xMontmorency]

Hi everyone,

I’m practising the Freshfields preparation materials, including the slider-style SJT questions, and I’m a bit unsure about how to approach them. For example, one question asks: “My best work is when I…” with one extreme being “working with others” and the other being “working on my own”.

In truth, my best work has usually been in group projects, so I put the slider around 80% towards the “working with others” side. Is this the right approach? I never pass these tests and I’m not sure how people get through them. Any advice would be appreciated!

Both are good answers. Teamwork and being able to work independently are both important.

Trying to reverse engineer what you think the grad rec team have decided is the 'correct' answer just isn't going to work. Put what you think works best for you.

IMO this just highlights the problems with SJTs. Personality traits are not an 'either' / 'or' that can be revealed with a sliding scale.

 

[CharlesT47]

@Andrei Radu
Or anyone for that matter. Could someone explain whether there is a structured finance element in PE? I'm trying to understand the main differences between Kirkland and Weil and one clear point is that Kirkland doesn't have nearly as strong of a securitisation/ structured finance capabilities though is trying to build that out.

My question is why would Kirkland want to do this? I don't think Kirkland is trying to challenge the big dogs like Milbank or Paul Hastings who dominate the instituional bank side. Are they trying to build into the CLO manager side? Or is structured finance an important part of PE? The only way I can see this if the PE firm that Kirkland is advising on needs some kind of mezzanine funding, which in my mind seems rarer than other types of funding.

Alternatively, if someone has insight into what Weil's structured finance team actually does (i.e is it a strong practice area or merely complementary to PE) that would be so helpful. I feel like it isn't a main practice area? Maybe complementary to restructuring? But again I have no clue.

 

[Anniee]

Withers, it's been more than 3 weeks since I've applied!! It's not clear from their website if they're rolling or not, anyone else still waiting to hear from them?

Hey, I have the same concern as I saw some ppl have received the sjt. Last year I received the test within 2 days of submitting the app. Hopefully it’s not a pfo 🥲

 

[johnsmith]

Does anyone have access to The Lawyer? I saw an article suggesting Ashurt are potentially merging with a US firm, but the content is paywalled, and I'd be interested to know if they've named the US firm in the article.

 

[Afuturetrainee]

Hi @Andrei Radu How would you go about answering the following questions, as to my understanding there is a lot of overlap of why Akin across both?

1. What motivates you to pursue a career as a commercial solicitor, and why do you see Akin as the right place to begin that journey? (250)
2. What are you looking for in your legal career, and how do you see a firm like Akin helping you achieve those goals? (250)

For the first part, discuss their awards and accomplishments. For the second part, highlight their personal development efforts, including training, pro bono work, and overall growth.

Then, in the practice area questions, mention the deals they worked on in the areas that interest you.

This is how I did mine,, not an official guidance.

Good luck!

 

[LaDiva]

Hey, I have the same concern as I saw some ppl have received the sjt. Last year I received the test within 2 days of submitting the app. Hopefully it’s not a pfo 🥲

It's hard to know why they're delaying the outcomes, but stressful nonetheless! Did you get through to the interview last year?

 

[xMontmorency]

@Andrei Radu
Or anyone for that matter. Could someone explain whether there is a structured finance element in PE? I'm trying to understand the main differences between Kirkland and Weil and one clear point is that Kirkland doesn't have nearly as strong of a securitisation/ structured finance capabilities though is trying to build that out.

My question is why would Kirkland want to do this? I don't think Kirkland is trying to challenge the big dogs like Milbank or Paul Hastings who dominate the instituional bank side. Are they trying to build into the CLO manager side? Or is structured finance an important part of PE? The only way I can see this if the PE firm that Kirkland is advising on needs some kind of mezzanine funding, which in my mind seems rarer than other types of funding.

Alternatively, if someone has insight into what Weil's structured finance team actually does (i.e is it a strong practice area or merely complementary to PE) that would be so helpful. I feel like it isn't a main practice area? Maybe complementary to restructuring? But again I have no clue.

Not sure I fully understand your question but some thoughts:

• Lawyers working on structured finance transactions would be finance lawyers not private equity (corporate) lawyers.
• Structured finance ≠ CLOs. Pretty sure CLOs are the biggest sub-category, but structured finance includes all kinds of financial instruments like derivatives and other wonky lending arrangements.
• I don't think either Weil or Kirkland have a particularly strong structured finance practice in London. They mostly focus on borrower-side LevFin.
  • Kirkland literally only has Suril Patel who basically only advises PE sponsors.
  • Weil does have Andrew Lauder and Jacky Kelly who do some lender side securitisation and derivatives work alongside LevFin.
  • But overall not much.
• But, given structured finance is a bit of a loose concept most finance departments will come across it in some form when working for clients.
• Most likely, the majority of the structured finance work Weil and Kirkland do is driven by borrower side mandates for PE clients that might involve structured forms of borrowing like margin lending, NAV financing and specific asset-backed or PIK loans in some whacky corporate structure, or work they do in restructurings.
• From what I can tell I don't think either of them are building out into the CLO manager side, or the institutional bank / private credit side. If I had to guess why, I'd say: (i) structured finance is smaller and probably a little less lucrative than general LevFin, (ii) tough competition, and (iii) it might generate conflicts of interest with your borrower-side clients if you started advising lenders.
• Not sure whether the question "is structured finance an important part of PE?" follows.
  • CLOs are private credit since the money is raised through a private fund structure.
  • Derivatives are neither (I think?)
  • CLOs and other forms of structured finance are an important part of traditional private equity in the sense that it eases access to debt. But a private equity firm may have nothing to do with the collateralisation of the loans they have taken out.
  • So, for a law firm, having a dedicated securitisation / secondaries practice isn't really necessary to be able to advise PE sponsors.

 

[Anniee]

How long for CC to inform you whether you’ve passed Watson Glaser?

I think if you pass they will send you an email right after you done the test. But if you haven’t heard back I would suggest emailing them, CC grad rec team is very responsive

 

[Anniee]

CMS!

Hi, if you still need guidance on this I’m happy to give some insight through private message. My answer got to the test stage this year (I’m assuming the test is not automatic 😅 )

 

[Abbie Whitlock]

@Abbie Whitlock Do you have any advice on how to answer this question: Give an example of when you used technology to improve efficiency or solve a problem. What did you learn from this experience?

Feel like this is a dumb question but what could count as the use of technology?

Hello!

That's a great question - it's not dumb at all! Technology can mean a lot of things, and in this context, I would say it is any tool, app or system that aims to make a task easier or more efficient.

For example:

1. Using legal research databases (such as Westlaw and LexisNexis) to find cases faster or more effectively
2. Creating a case summary or reading summary template in Word or Excel to standardise how you take notes and save time later.
3. Using a reference-management software (such as Zotero) to organise sources for university essays.
4. Setting up shared folders or Google Docs to collaborate within group projects

When approaching the question, I would approach it as:

1. What was the problem or task?
2. What technology did you use?
3. What was the result or impact?
4. What did you learn from it?

So don't panic - it doesn't have to be something really technical! It's just about showing you can use technology thoughtfully and effectively

 

[Abbie Whitlock]

Hi @Abbie Whitlock ! Hope you are doing well. I am currently applying for a law firm's open day, but i wasn't too sure on how should I approach this question. Could you help me give me some guidance on how to approach this question, especially the second part of the question? Should I talk more about my experiences, or skills?

The question: Please explain why you are applying to Wedlake Bell's open day and why you would be a good candidate for the firm?

Hello!

I'm well, thank you - I hope you are too! Absolutely, I'm happy to share my thoughts on this question.

For that kind of question ("Why are you applying and why would you be a good candidate"), you'll want to balance both your motivation and your personal qualities/skills. A good structure could be:

1. Why you're applying

Make sure that you show you've done some research into Wedlake Bell, and mention what genuinely attracts you to the firm. For example, their practice areas, client base, firm culture, or training programme. Try to link this to your own interests and previous experiences (i.e. you studied the subject at university, or you worked in a similar setting before).

2. Why you'd be a good candidate

This is where you bring in your skills, experiences, and personal attributes that show why you would be a good fit for the firm. You can definitely refer to examples from university, part-time work, volunteering, or any legal experience. For example, this could be communication skills you developed at a legal clinic, or collaboration skills from working within a university society.

3. What you've learned or what you hope to gain

With any open day application, it's important to discuss why you'd like to attend the open day specifically. You can round off your answer by mentioning what you hope to learn from the open day - it shows enthusiasm and a growth mindset!

In short: I'd focus half on motivation, and half on what makes you a strong candidate - whilst making sure you are discussing examples or experiences rather than just listing the skills or traits.

I hope that helps, and best of luck with your application!

 

[tosin4774]

Anyone attended white and case Mergers and acquisition webinar today? Please please PM to share any notes or screenshot. I will really appreciate this.

Same. I would appreciate it

 

[stilltrying]

Could anyone provide insight into Weil or Mayer Brown VI - can help with HSF and Latham AC and also freshfields and Hogan test 1 and 2 as well as white and case VI

 

[Bbhu19]

Hey after finishing milbank test 1 did anyone receive a feedback report?