• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • Office Hours with BCLP (Live Q&A)
    17 December 2025 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK) Hosted on TCLA TV
    Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!

    📺 View Event →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Kirsty Wilkins

Star Member
Graduate Recruitment
Oct 18, 2025
27
51
Has anybody heard back from Weil or Willkie yet who applied in November? Been almost 3 weeks since I applied to Weil and over a week since I’ve sent off my Willkie application.​
Hi @Harvey Specter

We have received hundreds of applications so far this month, so we are reading through each of them one by one and will get back to you. As a reminder the Willkie Grad Rec 'Team' is just one person, so it does take a long time to read each of them fully and get back to everyone.

Thanks!

Kirsty
 

DavidJC

Legendary Member
Dec 29, 2019
171
360
How long does the Freshfields WGT take?

How many questions, and does the time we take to complete the test matter here?
it's the same as HL Stage 2 if you've done that, really didn't actually take as long as I'd thought it might, I finished the entire Stage 2 test in just over 60 minutes with maybe 20-25 mins on the WGT (assuming approx 1 min per question, each of which has 4 sub-questions like in the practice assessment)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lawlawland

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
1,020
1,774
Hi Andrei Radu, I hope you’re well. I had a question for you as a future trainee at Davis Polk regarding their cover letter. The cover letter has an 800-word limit and asks applicants to address: why you are specifically interested in Davis Polk, why you are attracted to the work that the firm carries out, and the skills you have developed that would contribute to your success in the role.

I’m not sure how to structure this. Should I split it roughly 50/50 — for example, around 400 words on why Davis Polk and their work, and 400 words on my skills and attributes? Or would it be better to merge these sections? For instance, I plan to discuss a four-week internship as part of the “why Davis Polk” section, but that experience also helped me develop relevant skills. I’m a bit unsure how to balance this, so any guidance would be appreciated!
Hi @BobThebIlly I do not think the firm has any strict view as to how the response to this question should be structured. As such, I think your overriding principle when determining your approach should be to have an answer that is clear, well-put together, and easy to read and navigate, while also developing your analysis of the substantive points in the most convincing and nuanced manner possible. For me personally, this often led to splitting answers roughly 50/50 if I had two main elements to address, as I generally found combining them would make the connection between the different elements be somewhat hard to see on a quick read. Thus, if I were writing an answer to this question right now, this is the default approach I would consider going for.

That said, I have seen answers that combine the two work really well, particularly if there was a large overlap in terms of claimed interests/claimed skills and the experiences used to showcase these interests and skills. If you can ensure you can avoid sounding repetitive and that it will be clear when you are addressing which part of the question, I think you could try this out. For instance, your structure could look like this:
  1. Paragraph 1 (250-300 words): Explain a relevant experience using a STAR structure in 100ish words, explain how this makes you interested in the firm's work in another 100ish words, and then explain how it demonstrates you are a good fit in terms of skillset is another 50-100.
  2. Repeat this for Paragraph 2 and 3, but with different experiences, firm interests, and claimed skills.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BobThebIlly

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
1,020
1,774
Does it make sense to apply for Latham even without attending their Open Day?
Yes - while it seems like Latham places more weigh on open day attendance than other firms, I have heard of many people getting to the AC without it. This also makes sense from a recruitment policy perspective, as the firm would lose out on a huge talent pool by restricting their consideration to people who attended an open day.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
1,020
1,774
Hi guys - I'm going through the Mischon de Reya application form, and have a quick query to ask. If anyone's got any advice, I'd be really grateful :)

On the form, there's a section marked "Work Experience", but it only contains 4 available spaces (all of which are only 150 words long). The next section on the form is titled "Activities & Achievements"; here, there's 5 spaces available, all of which are 200 words long.
Would it be right to assume that the "Activities & Achievements" section is only for extra-curricular stuff (and so it wouldn't be a good idea to use it to list any examples of work experience that I couldn't fit into the previous section)?
I think so - the fact that the firm only provided you with 4 entries in the work experience section is likely a conscious choice to deviate from the norm, as most firms allow you to have around 10 or so entries. Thus, the firm probably wants to get candidates to be selective with the work experiences they discuss instead of mentioning everything and anything they did in the past. If this is the case, using the activities & achievements section to talk more about work experiences could be seen as you ignoring the restriction the firm was trying to place on you.

That said, I think there may be an exception if what you would discuss would be centrally focused on the achievement part, and merely ancillary in terms of discussing any work experience as the context of which the achievement took place. For instance, if you interned at a firm/company that had some internal competition (for instance, I know of some firms that have internal mooting competitions) and you placed 1st there, I think you could include this in the achievements section.
 
  • 🏆
Reactions: pfoapplicant

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.