Thank you so much, Andrei. It means a lot to hear this from you, so thank you for the genuine reassurance. I did pretty much all of the same things that you listed, so I'm really grateful to you for showing me that I am not necessarily out of the running.Hi @ashwright I have personally experienced this as well and progressed to an AC with V&E after a video interview I thought I had completely fumbled. I got cut off at the end, said I would speak through multiple points when starting my answer that I subsequently never got to, and just generally was a lot more nervous and less articulate than I assumed one would need to be progressed to the next stage. As such, I was sure I would not progress. This is also a phenomenon I have observed many times with other people, and I think it results from two things:
- Candidates often underestimate how difficult VIs feel for other people as well, and as such presume that they are uniquely overanxious and unable to seem calm and composed in front of the camera. In fact, in my experience the substantial majority of people find the experience to be a nerve-racking one. Thus, you seeming terrified when answering will not single you out as much as you may be tempted to think.
- Recruiters prioritise other qualities more than apparent confidence, as they are well-aware that this is an ability that comes with time and that is not necessarily best tested by the VI format, which is thought by many to be uniquely awkward. If you can show you have the right substantive kinds of ideas and motivations when answering questions, and if you can express your points in a reasonably clear and structured manner, many recruiters will be willing to overlook the fact that you seem a bit anxious and nervous.
Much appreciated, hope you have a good evening.