@Abbie Whitlock Do you have any advice for a written exercise that requires quite hefty on the spot reading? Just in terms of approach and how to structure!
Hi @yk1906Dear @Kirsty Wilkins !
I know this has already been addressed here, but what is the best way to provide our GCSE grades? Since I, like other candidates on this forum, don't have an option to provide them via the application form. Could it have something to do with my being schooled abroad?
Thank you for your help!!
Yesterday in the afternoonCongrats!! When did you receive the invite may I ask?
Thank you! 2027 TCCongrats!!
Did you apply for 2027 or 2028 TC? Thanks
I just know it’s not a guarantee, you can still get PFO’dhow likely is it if you attended the latham OD to get an AC seeing as you dont ahve to do the online test
Spring - it's surprising how the little emojis reactions can uplift your spirit! The race carries on!!Sorry to hear, is this for Spring or Summer?
Thanks that’s very helpful information.Thank you! 2027 TC
Thank you 🙏🙏Hi @yk1906
Your GCSE grades are automatically pulled through into your application from Vantage, so no need for you to do anything else - we will see them as part of your application once we receive it.
Good luck!
Kirsty
Andrei, I made a similar mistake where I started directly on why Davis Polk, should I try and rectify it now by emailing the early careers team?I would not write to grad rec about it. The general rule is that you should email recruiters about a mistake only if it is necessary to correct that mistake so that they are able to consider your application on its true merits (e.g. correcting a wrong grade entry) or to explain an error that may otherwise be misleading (e.g. correcting a statement that you are applying for a TC instead of a VS). Nonetheless, in your case it is clear what you actually intended to write, so there would be no point to emailing about it. As for your question about how much this could impact your progression chances: in my experience, if your application is a high-quality one otherwise, you can be progressed despite one or two attention to detail errors of this nature.
Hi!Hello, I’m reviewing my application answers for Wilkie and got a bit confused by this question: ‘Please explain why you would like a career in commercial law.’
I can’t tell if they’re asking for my motivation for pursuing a career in commercial law (based on what I liked/enjoyed during my experience in relation to commercial law), or whether they want me to explain ‘why/how my skills suit the career, hence I want to pursue this career’. It might be obvious, but I am overthinking a lot. So, I’d really appreciate any insight on this. Thanks in advance.
@Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu
There's a part of me that feels annoyed because they should have disclosed this on their site (unless I missed it) as I was intentionally avoiding firms with the critical thinking WG test so writing long essays and then getting rejected based on this test is going to hurt. But oh well, life is a bit like that - just got to take it in stride.Looks like Eversheds have introduced a WG style test. I would assume this is automatic given the deadline was only last night and it states ‘first stage’ on the email.
The website only mentioned VI, you are correct. They have notified about the test via email to those who applied. I remember Freshfields doing this last year with an additional SJTThere's a part of me that feels annoyed because they should have disclosed this on their site (unless I missed it) as I was intentionally avoiding firms with the critical thinking WG test so writing long essays and then getting rejected based on this test is going to hurt. But oh well, life is a bit like that - just got to take it in stride.