Andrei, I made a similar mistake where I started directly on why Davis Polk, should I try and rectify it now by emailing the early careers team?I would not write to grad rec about it. The general rule is that you should email recruiters about a mistake only if it is necessary to correct that mistake so that they are able to consider your application on its true merits (e.g. correcting a wrong grade entry) or to explain an error that may otherwise be misleading (e.g. correcting a statement that you are applying for a TC instead of a VS). Nonetheless, in your case it is clear what you actually intended to write, so there would be no point to emailing about it. As for your question about how much this could impact your progression chances: in my experience, if your application is a high-quality one otherwise, you can be progressed despite one or two attention to detail errors of this nature.
Hi!Hello, I’m reviewing my application answers for Wilkie and got a bit confused by this question: ‘Please explain why you would like a career in commercial law.’
I can’t tell if they’re asking for my motivation for pursuing a career in commercial law (based on what I liked/enjoyed during my experience in relation to commercial law), or whether they want me to explain ‘why/how my skills suit the career, hence I want to pursue this career’. It might be obvious, but I am overthinking a lot. So, I’d really appreciate any insight on this. Thanks in advance.
@Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu
There's a part of me that feels annoyed because they should have disclosed this on their site (unless I missed it) as I was intentionally avoiding firms with the critical thinking WG test so writing long essays and then getting rejected based on this test is going to hurt. But oh well, life is a bit like that - just got to take it in stride.Looks like Eversheds have introduced a WG style test. I would assume this is automatic given the deadline was only last night and it states ‘first stage’ on the email.
The website only mentioned VI, you are correct. They have notified about the test via email to those who applied. I remember Freshfields doing this last year with an additional SJTThere's a part of me that feels annoyed because they should have disclosed this on their site (unless I missed it) as I was intentionally avoiding firms with the critical thinking WG test so writing long essays and then getting rejected based on this test is going to hurt. But oh well, life is a bit like that - just got to take it in stride.
I hope so! I only completed my DLA WG last night, and I was worried that I was too behind in the rolling cycle to receive an AC invite in time. 🫠I think there's still a fair amount still doing their WG, wouldn't be surprised if they start offering ACs in late Dec-Jan time🤷♀️
If this is for the London office then I believe that the application wasn't rolling. It's similar to Addleshaw goddard in that they review applications before the deadline but don't fill spots till way afterI hope so! I only completed my DLA WG last night, and I was worried that I was too behind in the rolling cycle to receive an AC invite in time. 🫠
if you dont mind me asking, when did you receive the invitation, and was the only step before the SJT?Withers Vac Scheme Final Interview Invitation. Would be super super thankful for any recommendations on how to prepare - it is in a week for me. They don't give much info other than 'the interview consists of a 50-minute interview with HR and a partner'. @Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu would be very grateful for your tips!
No, fortunately, it was for a regional office- but that's good to know about AG!If this is for the London office then I believe that the application wasn't rolling. It's similar to Addleshaw goddard in that they review applications before the deadline but don't fill spots till way after
Not at all! I received it just an hour ago. Prior to that I was invited to do a proof-reading test yesterday, and had completed it the same day.if you dont mind me asking, when did you receive the invitation, and was the only step before the SJT?
Thank you. This helps a lot.Hi!
You're not overthinking - that question can read both ways, so the safest and strongest approach is usually to combine the two angles!
When firms ask "Why do you want a career in commercial law?", the graduate recruitment team essentially want to understand:
1. Your genuine motivation - what exposure, experiences or observations made you interested in commercial law specifically (not just law in general)
2. Your suitability - the skills, strengths and working style you have that make this career path a good fit overall.
Most strong answers will weave both together. For example:
1. Start with what sparked your interest (this could be work experience, commercial curiosity, something you studied, a deal you followed, etc)
2. Then link this motivation to the aspects of the job you're drawn to (complex transactions, client-facing work, strategic problem-solving, international matters, etc.). This is also a way to demonstrate an understanding of what trainee solicitors actually do!
3. Finish by showing how your skills and characteristics mean you'd thrive in that environment. Have a think about what skills and traits are essential for trainees, and discuss how you have showcased them in the past.
So it's not necessarily an either / or - they're really asking you to show both your motivation and your fit. A balanced and concise answer should cover everything they want to see!
I hope that helps, and best of luck with the application!!