Hi @Amgrad I am not sure I completely understand your question, so please feel free to follow up and clarify if I am getting it wrong. Is your main concern that you may be undermining how persuasive your responses to the "why do you want to work at a transactional firm" and "why Kirkland?" questions by discussing a restructuring story for the second answer but then not expressing a direct interest in the practice area the third and fourth answers? If so, I would not worry too much about this issue. Recruiters are well aware that candidates can be interested in several practices at the same time, and therefore do not have sufficient space to cover all of them in sufficient detail in every relevant answer.. As such, if you go ahead with your answers in the current form, I think they will likely conclude that you are interested in restructuring alongside PE, lev fin, and tax; which, if anything, perfectly fits a candidate profile Kirkland would see as fitting its London practice.For Kirkland & Ellis, the second question is asking about what news stories that captivated me which relevant to the firm's client. I pick Restructuring & Insolvency, but considering the third question ask "Why do you want to be a trainee solicitor in a transactional focused firm?" Made me wonder whether my answer to previous question would be weaken my points as Kirkland also excel in Restructuring & Insolvency, even according to UK Chamber (Band 1). In my third question I highlight its strong tax and leveraged finance, while the last question for why Kirkland, I pick private equity as it's the strongest and known for Kirkland, even in the US and global.
I've drafted my app and these 2 questions are hanging me. Please tell me how to approach them @Andrei Radu
Hi!Hi guys! I'm currently going through the work experience section of the Reed Smith application form - ordinarily, I'd list my work experience in reverse chronological order (with current work experience entries, and work experience entries with more recent end dates, being listed before entries with less recent end dates), but Reed Smith's form titles each work experience entry as "Second placement", "Third placement", "Fourth placement", and so on.
Do you think this means that candidates are expected to list their work experience entries in forward chronological order (with placements with earlier start dates being listed first, and followed by placements with more recent start dates), or am I reading a bit too much into the wording of the form?
As ever, if anyone has any ideas, I'd be super grateful!![]()
I meant I want to highlight restructuring and insolvency in the second question as it resonates to my background from emerging market where the issues become hot right now. I cited an article from Financial Times to strengthen my point as well as link it back to the recent deal and my work exp.Hi @Amgrad I am not sure I completely understand your question, so please feel free to follow up and clarify if I am getting it wrong. Is your main concern that you may be undermining how persuasive your responses to the "why do you want to work at a transactional firm" and "why Kirkland?" questions by discussing a restructuring story for the second answer but then not expressing a direct interest in the practice area the third and fourth answers? If so, I would not worry too much about this issue. Recruiters are well aware that candidates can be interested in several practices at the same time, and therefore do not have sufficient space to cover all of them in sufficient detail in every relevant answer.. As such, if you go ahead with your answers in the current form, I think they will likely conclude that you are interested in restructuring alongside PE, lev fin, and tax; which, if anything, perfectly fits a candidate profile Kirkland would see as fitting its London practice.
It's really tight for time I agree - but I think that it's supposed to be really harddid anyone else horrifically run out of time on the Taylor Wessing WE
Did mine yesterday around 9pm and received an email passing at 9:30am todayHi to those who passed the HSFK test, how long did it take for you to receive the ‘passed’ email? I completed mine yesterday afternoon and I am worried.
Is this for the London office? Had no idea they're already doing ACs.Anyone that did DLA AC yesterday PM me
Unless it’s changed this year, I believe they are non-rolling. The past 2 years they got back to people a few weeks after the deadline.Anyone know when approx we can expect to hear back from Vinson & Elkins for spring/summer VS? Anyone heard back yet so far?
No sadly not, haven’t really heard anything regarding ACs. Not even sure they have them for the AI one lmaoPeople who've applied for the Simmons AI internship, did you hear back from them yet?
The deadline just closed, has anyone actually been told if they passed or not?Could anyone who passed Latham's stage 2 online assessment previously give any insights and advice on preparation?
I understand there should also be ACs in January.Is this for the London office? Had no idea they're already doing ACs.