• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • Office Hours with BCLP (Live Q&A)
    17 December 2025 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK) Hosted on TCLA TV
    Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!

    📺 View Event →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
650
604
Hi guys! I'm currently going through the work experience section of the Reed Smith application form - ordinarily, I'd list my work experience in reverse chronological order (with current work experience entries, and work experience entries with more recent end dates, being listed before entries with less recent end dates), but Reed Smith's form titles each work experience entry as "Second placement", "Third placement", "Fourth placement", and so on.

Do you think this means that candidates are expected to list their work experience entries in forward chronological order (with placements with earlier start dates being listed first, and followed by placements with more recent start dates), or am I reading a bit too much into the wording of the form?
As ever, if anyone has any ideas, I'd be super grateful! :)
Hi!

I don't think you're overthinking it at all - those labels do look a bit like they're nudging you toward a chronological order! However, I don't think you need to do anything specific here. As long as you are consistent in the order you choose and its clear for the graduate recruitment team to follow, either direction is absolutely fine.

Most applicants will stick to reverse chronological order because it highlights recent experience first, but the opposite is also completely acceptable too. The key is just to keep it tidy and logical.

I hope that helps - best of luck with your application! :)
 
  • 🏆
Reactions: pfoapplicant

Amgrad

Legendary Member
Oct 2, 2025
311
329
Hi @Amgrad I am not sure I completely understand your question, so please feel free to follow up and clarify if I am getting it wrong. Is your main concern that you may be undermining how persuasive your responses to the "why do you want to work at a transactional firm" and "why Kirkland?" questions by discussing a restructuring story for the second answer but then not expressing a direct interest in the practice area the third and fourth answers? If so, I would not worry too much about this issue. Recruiters are well aware that candidates can be interested in several practices at the same time, and therefore do not have sufficient space to cover all of them in sufficient detail in every relevant answer.. As such, if you go ahead with your answers in the current form, I think they will likely conclude that you are interested in restructuring alongside PE, lev fin, and tax; which, if anything, perfectly fits a candidate profile Kirkland would see as fitting its London practice.
I meant I want to highlight restructuring and insolvency in the second question as it resonates to my background from emerging market where the issues become hot right now. I cited an article from Financial Times to strengthen my point as well as link it back to the recent deal and my work exp.

However, I am aware the next question (Q3) asked about a focused transactional firm which could crossline or weaken what I wrote about restructuring in the previous question since it's known as contentious work. Is there a R&I practice that focus on transactional only?

Also, I know firms love the multidisciplinary topics or areas to discuss, but just to strengthen my third question I add Tax & Lev Finance as it's tend to be more non-contentious than R&I.

And of course, I dedicated PE in the last (Q4) because of what I've mentioned before.
 
Reactions: Andrei Radu

annalise.joyn

Star Member
May 26, 2024
27
20
I have my Latham and Watkins VI which will be competency questions I (I think) tomorrow morning. it's 1 minute prep, 3 minute video. I've never done a video interview, how do I prepare, what do I do in the 1 minute preparation time, how should I speak/structure/talk about, what kind of questions should I expect from Latham and Watkins? I would like any sort of advice/tips/guidance as I have never done a video interview before and honestly every time I had a competency based question, it has always been terrible due to my anxiety even when I use STAR.
 
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

c.t.tc

Legendary Member
  • Jun 10, 2025
    171
    165
    If anyone else has done the TW test over the last few days I would also be curious as to how you might have found it? I just want to guage whether it’s fine for me to have found it super difficult
     

    summersun

    Legendary Member
    Nov 8, 2024
    133
    163
    Hi,
    I am looking at Farrer & Co and this is the last question I have to draft. However, I am not sure how to interpret it. I would really appreciate if anyone gave me some guidance. I did not know if I should address position of responsibilities/hobbies and the skills or if this was more aimed towards discussing open days, law fairs or other non work experience events related to law.
    "Outside of formal education and work experience, what steps have you taken to prepare for a career in law and why have these experiences been useful?"
     
    Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

    Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.