Hi!Hi guys! I'm currently going through the work experience section of the Reed Smith application form - ordinarily, I'd list my work experience in reverse chronological order (with current work experience entries, and work experience entries with more recent end dates, being listed before entries with less recent end dates), but Reed Smith's form titles each work experience entry as "Second placement", "Third placement", "Fourth placement", and so on.
Do you think this means that candidates are expected to list their work experience entries in forward chronological order (with placements with earlier start dates being listed first, and followed by placements with more recent start dates), or am I reading a bit too much into the wording of the form?
As ever, if anyone has any ideas, I'd be super grateful!![]()
I don't think you're overthinking it at all - those labels do look a bit like they're nudging you toward a chronological order! However, I don't think you need to do anything specific here. As long as you are consistent in the order you choose and its clear for the graduate recruitment team to follow, either direction is absolutely fine.
Most applicants will stick to reverse chronological order because it highlights recent experience first, but the opposite is also completely acceptable too. The key is just to keep it tidy and logical.
I hope that helps - best of luck with your application!