• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →
  • Office Hours with BCLP (Live Q&A)
    17 December 2025 5:30 pm – 6:30 pm (UK) Hosted on TCLA TV
    Join Isabel Elsey, Legal Recruitment Manager at BCLP, for a live Q&A session. Get details on secondments, innovation, growth areas, and everything else you’ve wanted to ask about life at BCLP!

    📺 View Event →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
1,013
1,761
Hello people, I have a written exercise coming up (never done one before) and I am a bit confused about how long a client email should be? Is it ok to write an executive summary (apx 250 words) and then say sth like, "should you need deeper insights, I expand briefly on each of the above points below" and provide a more in-depth analysis?
There is no strict rule as to how long a client email should be, as this will heavily depend on the details of the task and the amount of information you have to read and comment one, but also on the amount of time available - as this will determine how strict you have to be with yourself concerning what you can include in your answer without losing valuable time which would be better spent in another part of the answer. In practice, I think my written exercise ended up being anywhere from 1000 to 2000ish words; but I also know people who have been successful and had very different ranges.

As for the executive summary - I definitely think including one is a good idea, particularly if you have a longer answer following it; and in my view 250ish words would be an appropriate word count to dedicate to it assuming the rest of the written piece is at least around 1000ish words. Nonetheless, and while this is a bit of a pedantic point, I would likely not phrase the ending sentence in the specific way you mentioned (ie "should you need deeper insights") as this can somewhat suggest that the rest of the written piece is incidental to the executive summary and provides unnecessary detail - while in fact it contains the core of your analysis of the matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amgrad
Just finished latham stage 2, I struggled to find that, so want to post this to help ppl.

1. Video questions: difficult in terms of form not content. Just stay calm, use the given time wisely, (tho a unique form, they are still questions that you can prepare in advance I would say.) and you should believe that you can answer them well. But I didn't really prepare for it so I was chopping all the time and not smoothly enough i guess.

2. WG: extremely simple, you cannot believe it... for some reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillKitchen and Sharkfin

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
1,013
1,761
Hi @Andrei Radu @Abbie Whitlock! I have a more general question about approaching answering 'where else have you applied?' in interviews - is it appropriate to mention the stages you've reached or potential offers for vac schemes? I just wanted some insight in how firms could potentially view this and whether it is desirable or not to mention offers etc. Thanks!
I think it is definitely both appropriate and desirable to mention any advanced stages you have reached and/or any VS/TC offers, as this shows a number of valuable traits such as:
  1. The fact you have been serious with your application writing efforts and that therefore your interest in commercial law is a strong and genuine one.
  2. The fact that you have been identified by competent recruiters at rival firms as an incredibly strong candidate, which will likely make any firm consider your application more seriously.
  3. The fact that you may undergo VSs soon and thus undertake valuable work experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: panda1989

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
628
571
hi everyone. does anyone have any experience with realising that you’ve forgotten to include a module grade on your application form? how do i go about fixing this, deadline passed a week ago…will it look bad if I contact grad rec to let them know about my stupidity
Hey!

You're definitely not the first person this has happened to, so try not to panic or beat yourself up! I don't think it'll look bad to flag this - I'd suggest emailing the graduate recruitment team, just briefly explaining that you realised a module grade was missing from your application and attach the missing information.

Most graduate recruitment teams will understand that small admin mistakes can happen, and this is usually fine if you're proactive about letting them know! :)
 
  • 🤝
  • Like
Reactions: WillKitchen and lawyersum

Amgrad

Legendary Member
Oct 2, 2025
248
270
Hi all.. need advice for Written Exercise.

I am new to this type of test as this is my first cycle and I am coming from now law. I am aware of the Exam protocol or assessment policy, my concerns were:

• Do we need to turn on camera during the test?
• Are we monitored by a person (like invigilator) on real time?
• Are the questions sent over before the deadline?

I am so confused as the email only stated the time slot and mentioned that the assessor were partners and associates, which graded anonymously. Is this a general rule or practice that might be varied by firm?

Also, please give me the most recent tips if any @Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu
 

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
628
571
Hi all.. need advice for Written Exercise.

I am new to this type of test as this is my first cycle and I am coming from now law. I am aware of the Exam protocol or assessment policy, my concerns were:

• Do we need to turn on camera during the test?
• Are we monitored by a person (like invigilator) on real time?
• Are the questions sent over before the deadline?

I am so confused as the email only stated the time slot and mentioned that the assessor were partners and associates, which graded anonymously. Is this a general rule or practice that might be varied by firm?

Also, please give me the most recent tips if any @Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu
Hello!

Congratulations on the written exercise invite! To address each of your main questions:
  1. Camera on: this likely differs from firm to firm. I've sat written exercises before where it asks for permission to use your camera (and, therefore, I assume it was recording!) and others where it has not. If camera use is required, it will be very clearly stated in the instructions of the written exercise
  2. Live monitoring: there is typically no live invigilator - written exercises are usually completed independently within a set time window. Some firms may use basic monitoring software, but again, this would be disclosed in advance
  3. When questions are released: in most cases, the questions are released at the start of your allocated time slot, not beforehand. You would then submit your answer before the deadline at the end of that slot. I would say it is uncommon for firms to send the questions early.
The point about assessors being partners and associates grading anonymously is very standard and simply means:
  • Your work is marked without personal details attached
  • Reviewers are focusing on your content, structure, and commercial awareness
So, yes - I'd say that these are general practices, but small details can vary by firm. If anything differs (i.e. cameras on, live assessment, early access to questions), firms will be very explicit about it.

In terms of quick tips for the written exercise, I have quoted some posts below that might be a helpful starting point!

Wishing you the best of luck! :)

Hello!

Congratulations on receiving the written exercise invite! Whilst I am not too sure on the specifics of the Dechert exercise, I've outlined some advice below that I gave a little while ago in relation to preparing for written exercises.

  • Practice timed writing - pick a 30-45 minute slot, read a short business or news article, and summarise the key points in a structured 1-2 page memo with a clear conclusion summarising your findings.
  • Work on prioritisation - pick an article with a lot of information, and practice picking out the 3-4 most important issues rather than trying to summarise and include everything.
  • Use a clear structure - this was the main thing that I implemented that helped me score higher on written assessments! Follow a clear structure in your answer, and practice what this would be for each type of document. For example, you might be asked to write an email to a client, a letter, a memo, or a report. Have a look at what the structure of each of these should be, and have a go drafting a couple to get used to it in advance.
  • Check clarity - after writing (potentially one of the above), ask yourself if someone with no context to the facts could follow along with the information and your reasoning.
  • Proofread under pressure - I would get used to quickly checking grammar and flow, as this is really important in a written exercise! I sometimes struggled with this, as the pressure made me skip parts of my writing, but I found that literally following along with a pen or your finger can make sure you don't miss anything.
  • Review sample case studies - I would have a look online and see if there are any free resources that you can have a go at. A true lifesaver during my last cycle was this forum post by Jacob Miller, and I would definitely give it a read!

I'd focus on condensing large chunks of information into clear, concise summaries, and then presenting these within a straightforward structure that flows logically and leads to a well-reasoned conclusion.

I hope that helps, and best of luck with the written exercise - we'll all be rooting for you! 🎉

Of course, no problem at all!!

Since client emails are such a common format in written exercises, it's definitely worth getting comfortable with how to approach them! A few things that I kept in mind when preparing:

Understand the Purpose and Audience

Before you start writing, clarify who you are writing to (e.g. a client, supervisor, or a colleague) and what information they need from you. The tone, level of formality, and structure will vary depending on whether it's an internal email or an email to an external client.

For example, if you are emailing a client, you want to ensure that they are able to understand any legal principles that you are outlining in your email. As such, it's important to make sure you write it in layman's terms and don't just recite the information given in the materials. However, if you are emailing a supervisor, I would focus on highlighting the most important pieces of information as you are effectively trying to save them time in going through the materials themselves. I would always aim to write in a professional way, and frame it like you would an actual email - such as a subject line and a closing sentence.

Use a Clear and Logical Structure

The main thing that I changed when approaching written exercises was making sure that I had a clear and logical structure. A good client email should be easy to follow. A simple structure could look like:

  1. Opening: A brief, polite greeting and context for why you're writing (and what you'll be discussing in the email). If you're emailing a supervisor, it might be useful to include a short summary of your findings at the top (i.e. an early conclusion), and then go into more detail below.
  2. Main Body: Summarise the key points or advice clearly and concisely, using short paragraphs. It might be appropriate to use headings and subtitles, especially if there is a lot of information. The goal is to make sure that the client can follow along, and that it isn't just a massive wall of text that is difficult to read.
  3. Closing: End with next steps, an offer of assistance, or a polite sign-off (e.g. "Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further"). These elements distinguish an email exercise from a general report or memo, and shows that you are following the brief exactly! If you are emailing a supervisor, I would try to show some proactivity in the closing parts - such as offering to write a first draft of a document or client email.

Keep your tone professional and approachable

I would aim for clear, confident language without being overly formal (but still professional). This can be tricky, but phrases such as "I'd recommend..." or "It may be helpful..." strike a nice balance. Avoid overly technical language or long-winded phrasing - simplicity often conveys professionalism! As stated above, I would definitely avoid legal jargon if you are writing to a client, unless you are certain that a client would understand it.

Also remember that tone can shift slightly depending on the client's relationship with the firm. If you are told this information, a longstanding client might suit a warmer tone, whilst a first-time contact may call for a more formal approach. However, if in doubt, I would always go for a more formal approach - especially in a professional context!

Be precise and client-focused

Remember the purpose for why you are actually writing to the client, and tailor your response to the client's actual issue. I would avoid copying large chunks of background information from the brief (as the client will already have this information!) - instead, demonstrate understanding of their issue by reframing the key points in your own words and applying them directly to the client's situation. Make sure to keep your advice practical - clients care more about what they should do next than about the legal theory behind it. You might find it useful to use signposting phrases such as "In summary..." or "Based on the information provided..." to make your reasoning easy to follow. If there are uncertainties, I would make sure to address them but be reassuring - e.g. "Further details would be needed to confirm this position, but at this stage...".

Check for clarity and tone at the end

Before your time runs out, take a moment to review your email. I always found it helpful to read it aloud (if possible) or follow along with my finger - this helps you catch sentences that are too long, unclear, or sound abrupt. Look for opportunities to simplify, and if a sentence takes more than one breath to read, it's probably too long! Make sure your sign-off fits the context (things such as "Kind regards" or "Best wishes" usually work best). The graduate recruitment team / assessors will be looking for professionalism in formatting and presentation - consistent spacing, clear paragraphing, and correct spelling and grammar will all make a strong impression.

As a practical tip to practice: You could start by taking short case studies and draft sample emails that summarise your advice in 200-300 words. This helps you get used to organising your thoughts quickly and writing in a professional, accessible way.

I hope that helps!
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Amgrad

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.