The core benefit of doing a TI is human interaction. You can pick up on tonal cues, ask for brief clarification if needed, and build a more natural rapport. It feels less like a performance and more like a dialogue. A VI can often make you feel like you're speaking into a void which can heighten anxiety, and cause some people to perform less adequately.What is the benefit of doing a TI as opposed to a VI? I have reasonable adjustments and have struggled with VI’s but always felt it may be unfair to request a TI or questions beforehand as ultimately you’re meeting the recruiters themselves and can build a small but somewhat personal rapport. Also what if I’m asking for too much too soon. I mainly pass applications that do not require a VI.
Does GR look down on those who request this adjustment? Is there discrepancy between those doing the VI and TI? How does this translate to meeting a client on a zoom call would adjustments made too or is it only for assessment purposes?
Any GR team that views a reasonable adjustment request negatively is failing in its duty to ensure fair access. In practice, GR teams handle these requests confidentially and routinely. Using an adjustment you're entitled to does not mark your application down, it simply ensures the assessment measures what it's supposed to.
The format is different, but the assessment criteria are the same. You are still being evaluated on your motivation, competencies, and commercial awareness. The TI might allow for slightly more nuance in a conversation, but the benchmark for success doesn't change. The firm is assessing your suitability for the role of a solicitor, which leads to your next point.
Good luck on your applications!!