• TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Dechert PFO post WE for Spring VS. I did the WE around 2 weeks ago. I applied in early Dec and got the WE like 6 weeks post app. I find these middle stages hit or miss tbh. I just got the PFO for this.

However in other news…

Willkie partner interview invite!! I honestly didn’t expect it cos I literally flopped the Skadden WE. I received the email earlier this week, for anybody interested in knowing that info.​
 

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
816
866
When asked ab an interesting news story what exactly is the interviewer acc looking for? I get you have to link it to the firm and its sectors is that it?
Hey!

That is definitely part of the answer that they are looking for, but I'd try to expand slightly!

When interviewers ask this, they're mainly testing how you approach the story (rather than the story itself). They want to see that you keep up with commercial or legal news and understand why the story matters, and that you can then explain it clearly and concisely. Importantly, you should also be able to spot the implications for clients and, where relevant, the firm itself.

Linking it to the firm or its sectors definitely helps, but it doesn't need to be forced. A structure that I would usually follow is:
  1. Brief context: set out what happened in one or two sentences, focusing on the core facts rather than details. The aim is to show that you understand the story well enough to explain it clearly and concisely.
  2. Why it is interesting and important: explain why this caught your attention. This might be because it affects a particular industry, highlights a wider market trend, creates legal or regulatory uncertainty, or shows how businesses are responding to change
  3. Implications for businesses or clients: discuss the practical consequences. This could be who is affected, what risks or opportunities arise, and what commercial decisions companies may now need to think about in response.
  4. Relevance to the firm: if appropriate, link this back to the firm's practice areas, sectors, or client base. This doesn't need to be forced - it can be as simple as noting where the firm might advise clients navigating the issue, and what practice areas might be involved.
  5. Your view: you could end with a short comment that shows your own judgment on the situation (i.e. whether you think the development is positive, challenging, or uncertain - and why)

You don't need to go into lots of technical detail - simply having an awareness of how the news story will affect clients in that sector and how the firm might assist them should demonstrate good commercial awareness! I hope that helps :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: starbar_3

DoNotRedeem

Distinguished Member
Dec 19, 2025
52
113
Dechert PFO post WE for Spring VS. I did the WE around 2 weeks ago. I applied in early Dec and got the WE like 6 weeks post app. I find these middle stages hit or miss tbh. I just got the PFO for this.

However in other news…

Willkie partner interview invite!! I honestly didn’t expect it cos I literally flopped the Skadden WE. I received the email earlier this week, for anybody interested in knowing that info.​
Hey Harvey, massive congrats on Willkie! Could I ask when you got the pfo from Dechert post WE, I did mine for spring 3 weeks ago (15/01) and nilch :/
 

FutureTraineeMaybe

Legendary Member
Premium Member
Feb 15, 2024
346
417
Hey!

I'm doing well, thank you - I hope you are too! 😁

Whilst I couldn't say for certain, it might be that this wording is included as a standard line in their emails and isn't targeted at you specifically. It just means they'll be available shortly before the interview in case anyone has approved adjustments.

Therefore, it is unlikely that you need to mention it in your reply unless you actually require an adjustment - a simple email confirming your availability should be perfectly fine!

Best of luck with the interview, I'm sure you'll do great! 💪
Thank you!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Addleshaw Goddard VI. My question is, they’re saying that they operate on a blind recruitment policy- in the email it says the video isn’t sent to them, only the audio, it is a voice interview but the camera is on but the recording isn’t sent to them. Does that mean I can cover my camera? My adhd is bad and I tend to look at myself instead of the camera.

Also anyone any insight about the questions? Thanks.

Have done VI and AC for Dentons, PM,and can offer insight about Bird&Bird and Dechert.
Hiya, Congratulations on getting the VI. Could I ask, which office is this for ?
 

elle woods

Legendary Member
Dec 4, 2025
734
1,657
Hi all. I'm super curious as to when we'll get ACs from Linklaters. I've seen some discussion on the forum but could anyone please catch me up? Should I be expecting a PFO if I've not heard anything by this point? Thank you.
they seem to be giving them out on a weekly (ish) basis - they will be running until the end of February, so there are still lots of chances! I'd say don't write them off for another couple of weeks at least.
 
Hey!

That is definitely part of the answer that they are looking for, but I'd try to expand slightly!

When interviewers ask this, they're mainly testing how you approach the story (rather than the story itself). They want to see that you keep up with commercial or legal news and understand why the story matters, and that you can then explain it clearly and concisely. Importantly, you should also be able to spot the implications for clients and, where relevant, the firm itself.

Linking it to the firm or its sectors definitely helps, but it doesn't need to be forced. A structure that I would usually follow is:
  1. Brief context: set out what happened in one or two sentences, focusing on the core facts rather than details. The aim is to show that you understand the story well enough to explain it clearly and concisely.
  2. Why it is interesting and important: explain why this caught your attention. This might be because it affects a particular industry, highlights a wider market trend, creates legal or regulatory uncertainty, or shows how businesses are responding to change
  3. Implications for businesses or clients: discuss the practical consequences. This could be who is affected, what risks or opportunities arise, and what commercial decisions companies may now need to think about in response.
  4. Relevance to the firm: if appropriate, link this back to the firm's practice areas, sectors, or client base. This doesn't need to be forced - it can be as simple as noting where the firm might advise clients navigating the issue, and what practice areas might be involved.
  5. Your view: you could end with a short comment that shows your own judgment on the situation (i.e. whether you think the development is positive, challenging, or uncertain - and why)

You don't need to go into lots of technical detail - simply having an awareness of how the news story will affect clients in that sector and how the firm might assist them should demonstrate good commercial awareness! I hope that helps :)
This is really helpful, thank you :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

an03

Star Member
Oct 20, 2023
34
27
Hey!

That is definitely part of the answer that they are looking for, but I'd try to expand slightly!

When interviewers ask this, they're mainly testing how you approach the story (rather than the story itself). They want to see that you keep up with commercial or legal news and understand why the story matters, and that you can then explain it clearly and concisely. Importantly, you should also be able to spot the implications for clients and, where relevant, the firm itself.

Linking it to the firm or its sectors definitely helps, but it doesn't need to be forced. A structure that I would usually follow is:
  1. Brief context: set out what happened in one or two sentences, focusing on the core facts rather than details. The aim is to show that you understand the story well enough to explain it clearly and concisely.
  2. Why it is interesting and important: explain why this caught your attention. This might be because it affects a particular industry, highlights a wider market trend, creates legal or regulatory uncertainty, or shows how businesses are responding to change
  3. Implications for businesses or clients: discuss the practical consequences. This could be who is affected, what risks or opportunities arise, and what commercial decisions companies may now need to think about in response.
  4. Relevance to the firm: if appropriate, link this back to the firm's practice areas, sectors, or client base. This doesn't need to be forced - it can be as simple as noting where the firm might advise clients navigating the issue, and what practice areas might be involved.
  5. Your view: you could end with a short comment that shows your own judgment on the situation (i.e. whether you think the development is positive, challenging, or uncertain - and why)

You don't need to go into lots of technical detail - simply having an awareness of how the news story will affect clients in that sector and how the firm might assist them should demonstrate good commercial awareness! I hope that helps :)
Thank you!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hey Harvey, massive congrats on Willkie! Could I ask when you got the pfo from Dechert post WE, I did mine for spring 3 weeks ago (15/01) and nilch :/
It was like an hour ago so if you haven’t heard back from them it ought to be good news. Best of luck for the Dechert Spring VS champ! :)
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.