It looks like some people heard back from Dechert - if I haven't, should I be worried? I applied 31/12
-
Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
-
TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.Join →
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
- Thread starter Ram Sabaratnam
- Start date
Cov PFO on a Sunday lol. At least it wasn't on Valentines day
Anyone from Travers Smith for summer VS?
Covington just PFO'd me on a Sunday??? That's SO disrespectful omg.
Same, I haven't, applied mid December. I asked LLM and got unexpected responses.
Is there anyone would like to kindly share the successful application form? pls pm. My real dream firmany more ac invites from covington? dream firm tbh
I'd really appreciate any insight into the HSF and Jones Day ACs!
COVINGTON PFO on a Sunday?! WTF they don't take the weekends off there??
maybe its good we got rejected bc i shiver to imagine the culture of a law firm where even the HR is working on sunday lolCOVINGTON PFO on a Sunday?! WTF they don't take the weekends off there??
Nahh they just automatically set it to Sunday to make us even more pissed off (to laugh at us)
currently the only vac applications i have left waiting are travers smith and shoosmiths... also applied to TC at withers and some other firms but those are very unlikely so.. TRAVERS SMITH AND SHOOSMITHS PLEASEEE PULL THROUGHHH
I have come to join the Covington Sunday PFO Club x
@Covington, even God took a day of rest you know x
@Covington, even God took a day of rest you know x
Anyone else feel that the competition this year must be so high (every PFO mentioning high volumes of qualified candidates) that anyone with mitigating circumstances doesn't stand a chance?
Im curious if AI supported applications have started reaching critical mass.
It's a vicious cycle because every high quality, targeted application to a dream firm that rejects post-app fuels the pressure to apply to two more firms with less tailored applications at the risk of wasting an application cycle
My perspective has changed a bit on AI, and I saw a good quote on a Youtube about it "if you can't be bothered to express your thoughts in your own words, I can't be bothered to listen to it".
As such if I was a recruiter and saw any kind of AI tropes at all, I'd be hitting the reject button so fast I'd not read the rest of the app.
This reflects (personally speaking) seeing all these AI slop posts on X and LinkedIn, and even now AI-generated music on Youtube doing big numbers over people who actually put in effort. Also every time I open FB there's some AI slop video that people are commenting on, and I have to hit "do not show me this", but the people at FB and Youtube and so on don't see a problem with this disgusting AI slop because it's increasing viewer minutes and ad impressions and so on and the average person is fooled so why not (from their perspective) obliterate all art and human expression and replace it with worthless slop - the slop keeps coming no matter how many times I try to block it.
If you only use AI for limited typo checks, then it will only help, but I have a suspicion that AI will have made the average application worse, at least assuming that the average recruiter is as allergic to any hint of AI generation as I now am.
I 100% agree, but I worry that the response to recieving a higher proportion of AI slop apps for recruiters as not been to reject based on AI, but to increase the score thresholds one must achieve to get progressed and not read as many applications at all
Last edited:
I agree that the common use of AI is sloppy but in my opinion if your able to use AI as a tool just like you would use Google or grammarly rather than use it to offload your thinking, it’s much more efficient then using your brain on its own, leading to some people being able to apply to 12 firms pass 9 first stage and get 4AC whilst some apply to 5 and get 4 pfo post app (hypothetically)
Sadly, there's no surefire way to do so accurately though. I would imagine your instinct as to hitting the reject button quickly is rather accurate, but no doubt they get it wrong A LOT. All that has happened with AI usage is that more applications are being pumped out that are of a decent quality, which means people who actually try are getting pushed out of the process.
It just means the better AI gets, and the more applicants there are, the more luck you need to get through this process. From day one, my only thought has been "it does not matter how good you are, it matters how lucky you are". Which is twofold - keep going as you may get lucky, or give up because it was never about your skill in the first place.
I personally prefer the mentality of the former.
For AC’s, group presentation- does it matter if you are 4 people in a group, whether you speak first, or second or last? For example, how can I make sure that I will be able to speak the second? I don’t wanna be last.. cause it looks bad doesn’t it? Does anyone have any insight on this?
Similar threads
- Sticky
