Linkedin or on here?(off topic just seen another SM offer and feeling increasingly scared ahhh)
Linkedin or on here?(off topic just seen another SM offer and feeling increasingly scared ahhh)
Haven’t got that far. When I said assessment, I meant the automatic one after the application form.people have said they could take a few weeks to get back after the AC
ApplicationCan I ask if this was post AC or just the application? Thanks![]()
Can I ask if this was post AC or just the application? Thanks![]()
Can I ask if this was post AC or just the application? Thanks![]()
Can I ask if this was post AC or just the application? Thanks![]()
Can I ask if this was post AC or just the application? Thanks![]()
Number of Trainees / number of VS places available. Often the figures for both are published somewhere.Question for those in the know - how does one find out the conversion rate from vac schemes to TCs? As from a purely risk averse perspective that’d be a great thing to know
They made some questions quite twisted ngl, but if you've done a lot of WGs you'll avoid these traps and do just fineWas the WG actually that bad… I’m scared x
Post appCan I ask if this was post AC or just the application? Thanks![]()
I think what happened is that the first results were lower than expected, so they sent more invites. If anything, I'd take this as a positive sign, I don't think you're at disadvantage because you were on the reserve list.Yeah I’m wondering if I was put on some sort of reserve list (as I only received an invite today) because I checked last year’s thread and Orrick sent invites out on one specific day, hmmm
Hey!@Abbie Whitlock I hope you are well! I would really value your insight on the following situation.
During a firm’s AC I really enjoyed being interviewed by one Senior Associate and her “off the record” explanation of her team’s practice (which is a sub-team of dispute resolution) at the firm at the end of the interview. I ended up getting the vac scheme offer.
I was wondering if I could ask HR if it would be possible to be placed within her team, giving the associate’s insight into her practice as a reason? DR is certainly a seat option for the scheme, but not sure if the associate’s specific Commercial Crime sub-team is.
Trying to avoid being looked at in a negative light in any way as I am eager to convert into a TC.
Thank you in advance!
Hey!I have an AC coming up and includes a debate / group exercise and I have never ever done such a thing esp in assessed AC environment. Does anyone have any insights or advice pretty please
Hey!
Congratulations on being invited to the Farrer AC, that is fantastic news!
The group activity in my assessment centre involved being split into teams and you receive a scenario that you will discuss (almost in a debate-like setting). On the firms' website, an example scenario they have outlined is: "Should everyone be able to enjoy protection from media intrusion into their private life, or are there categories of individuals / circumstances where one’s reasonable expectation of privacy must fall away?"
Your team will be assigned either "for" or "against" this question, and you have 20 minutes to prepare your argument (without Google) before debating for 20 minutes with another team. The aim is reach a joint decision!
Therefore, I would say that the level of commercial awareness required is relatively low, and you are assessed more on how you engage with your team to form your argument and how you then relay this during the discussion portion. Whilst my topic was not the one listed above, it was very accessible and something that you would have an understanding of from day-to-day life. The firm has also listed on their website what candidates will be assessed on as:
- General early impressions - engaged in the process, good understanding of the task
- People management - demonstrates ability to bring others into the discussion rather than just taking charge
- Oral communication - able to explain and express ideas clearly and concisely
- Contribution - added to the quality of the discussion whether helping to reinforce, clarify or broaden views and issues (looking more for content quality of the contribution rather than speaking a lot)
- Teamwork - demonstrated respect for others' views and opinions, healthy contribution rather than combative competition; able to listen to others
Based on the above, I would focus on making sure that you construct a clear argument and try to display the above traits when interacting with others. What worked well for my team (in which 3 out of 4 of us received a VS offer!) was identifying one point within the topic that we felt confident discussing and each taking the lead on that. This meant we could each share our strongest arguments, but also add additional thoughts and build on each other's points where relevant. This approach allowed us to demonstrate our thinking clearly, whilst also showing that we could listen, collaborate, and support the team's overall contributions.
I hope that assists - wishing you the best of luck with the AC!![]()
I heard back yesterday (18/02), and did my interview I think w/c 2nd February. So it took about under 2 weeks for them to get back to me.When did you hear?