• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

hey everyone, i've got an upcoming AC and was wondering if anyone had any tips on framing a previous vacation scheme that i didnt convert. bit anxious about this as this AC is for my dream firm so would be super grateful for any help !!
Hey!

Congratulations on the AC invite!

As someone who failed to convert a few vacation schemes last cycle, this is definitely something I worried about - however, I wasn't asked about my previous vacation schemes, so try not to stress too much about it!

The key is to frame the vacation scheme positively and reflectively. You don't need to go into details about not converting, as firms understand that there are many factors that go into those decisions. Instead, I would focus on what you gained from the scheme - e.g. the skills you developed, the exposure you had, and any moments that strengthened your motivations for commercial law.

It is also good to show self-awareness by reflecting on what you learned about yourself and what you have done since to improve (based on any feedback you received post-VS). I would focus on tangible steps that you have taken - for example, sharpening commercial awareness, building confidence in group settings, etc. This shows resilience and a willingness to learn, which are essential traits for a trainee!

If you are asked directly about not converting (which I never was!), I'd just keep it honest and avoid sounding defensive. You should focus on discussing how the experience has made you a stronger candidate now, and what you learned from it.

Good luck!! :)
 
Does anyone have tips on how to prepare for a written exercise you’re asked to complete during a vacation scheme? I would be grateful for any tips!! @Abbie Whitlock
Hello!

I have quoted a few different posts on written exercises below, which I hope you find useful! In my past experience with written exercises on vacation schemes, they have usually involved being given a small booklet of information which you use to write a report or email to a client. Therefore, I'd definitely make sure that you have a good understanding of the structure of these and what you need to include (e.g. formalities, headings, etc.).

Don't underestimate time management as well - give yourself some time to read the materials and plan what you want to write, but don't put off the actual writing for too long as otherwise you might have to rush! I am someone that usually has additional time left at the end of assessments, but I have nearly ran out of time in a few written exercises as there is quite a lot to get through.

Best of luck!! :)

Hello!

Congratulations on getting the invite! 🎉 Whilst I haven't completed the Ashurst written exercise, they will usually test your ability to communicate clearly and structure your arguments logically - similar to what you'd do as a trainee when drafting emails or internal notes.

I've outlined some previous tips that I always used when preparing for written exercises below:
  • Practice timed writing - pick a 30-45 minute slot, read a short business or news article, and summarise the key points in a structured 1-2 page memo with a clear conclusion summarising your findings.
  • Work on prioritisation - pick an article with a lot of information, and practice picking out the 3-4 most important issues rather than trying to summarise and include everything.
  • Use a clear structure - this was the main thing that I implemented that helped me score higher on written assessments! Follow a clear structure in your answer, and practice what this would be for each type of document.
  • Check clarity - after writing (potentially one of the above), ask yourself if someone with no context to the facts could follow along with the information and your reasoning.
  • Proofread under pressure - I would get used to quickly checking grammar and flow, as this is really important in a written exercise! I sometimes struggled with this, as the pressure made me skip parts of my writing, but I found that literally following along with a pen or your finger can make sure you don't miss anything.
  • Review sample case studies - I would have a look online and see if there are any free resources that you can have a go at. A true lifesaver during my last cycle was this forum post by Jacob Miller, and I would definitely give it a read!

The main thing that assisted me in written exercises is following a clear structure! I would go through and read all of the materials first, and then go back to pick out the key details. You should be looking for key issues, areas that you will require more information, and anything that you think is important for the client to know.

I would then follow a clear structure in your answer. There are a a few different types of documents that they could test you on - e.g. an email, memo, report, note, etc. I would have a look beforehand at the formatting of each, and have a go at writing them! If you are writing a letter / email to a client, make sure that you aren't including technical terms and writing in way that is easy for them to understand.

I would also try and find ways to showcase that you have the skills that they are looking for in trainees. For example, in one of my previous ACs I was asked to write an email to a supervisor. In this email, I outlined my arguments and recommendation, but I ended it by offering to draft the email / document for the client (e.g. proactivity). This will be dependant on each exercise, but if you can incorporate this in some way, I think it's a great way of standing out!

I hope that assists - best of luck with the written exercise, I'm sure you'll smash it! :)

Of course, no problem at all!!

Since client emails are such a common format in written exercises, it's definitely worth getting comfortable with how to approach them! A few things that I kept in mind when preparing:

Understand the Purpose and Audience

Before you start writing, clarify who you are writing to (e.g. a client, supervisor, or a colleague) and what information they need from you. The tone, level of formality, and structure will vary depending on whether it's an internal email or an email to an external client.

For example, if you are emailing a client, you want to ensure that they are able to understand any legal principles that you are outlining in your email. As such, it's important to make sure you write it in layman's terms and don't just recite the information given in the materials. However, if you are emailing a supervisor, I would focus on highlighting the most important pieces of information as you are effectively trying to save them time in going through the materials themselves. I would always aim to write in a professional way, and frame it like you would an actual email - such as a subject line and a closing sentence.

Use a Clear and Logical Structure

The main thing that I changed when approaching written exercises was making sure that I had a clear and logical structure. A good client email should be easy to follow. A simple structure could look like:

  1. Opening: A brief, polite greeting and context for why you're writing (and what you'll be discussing in the email). If you're emailing a supervisor, it might be useful to include a short summary of your findings at the top (i.e. an early conclusion), and then go into more detail below.
  2. Main Body: Summarise the key points or advice clearly and concisely, using short paragraphs. It might be appropriate to use headings and subtitles, especially if there is a lot of information. The goal is to make sure that the client can follow along, and that it isn't just a massive wall of text that is difficult to read.
  3. Closing: End with next steps, an offer of assistance, or a polite sign-off (e.g. "Please let me know if you'd like to discuss further"). These elements distinguish an email exercise from a general report or memo, and shows that you are following the brief exactly! If you are emailing a supervisor, I would try to show some proactivity in the closing parts - such as offering to write a first draft of a document or client email.

Keep your tone professional and approachable

I would aim for clear, confident language without being overly formal (but still professional). This can be tricky, but phrases such as "I'd recommend..." or "It may be helpful..." strike a nice balance. Avoid overly technical language or long-winded phrasing - simplicity often conveys professionalism! As stated above, I would definitely avoid legal jargon if you are writing to a client, unless you are certain that a client would understand it.

Also remember that tone can shift slightly depending on the client's relationship with the firm. If you are told this information, a longstanding client might suit a warmer tone, whilst a first-time contact may call for a more formal approach. However, if in doubt, I would always go for a more formal approach - especially in a professional context!

Be precise and client-focused

Remember the purpose for why you are actually writing to the client, and tailor your response to the client's actual issue. I would avoid copying large chunks of background information from the brief (as the client will already have this information!) - instead, demonstrate understanding of their issue by reframing the key points in your own words and applying them directly to the client's situation. Make sure to keep your advice practical - clients care more about what they should do next than about the legal theory behind it. You might find it useful to use signposting phrases such as "In summary..." or "Based on the information provided..." to make your reasoning easy to follow. If there are uncertainties, I would make sure to address them but be reassuring - e.g. "Further details would be needed to confirm this position, but at this stage...".

Check for clarity and tone at the end

Before your time runs out, take a moment to review your email. I always found it helpful to read it aloud (if possible) or follow along with my finger - this helps you catch sentences that are too long, unclear, or sound abrupt. Look for opportunities to simplify, and if a sentence takes more than one breath to read, it's probably too long! Make sure your sign-off fits the context (things such as "Kind regards" or "Best wishes" usually work best). The graduate recruitment team / assessors will be looking for professionalism in formatting and presentation - consistent spacing, clear paragraphing, and correct spelling and grammar will all make a strong impression.

As a practical tip to practice: You could start by taking short case studies and draft sample emails that summarise your advice in 200-300 words. This helps you get used to organising your thoughts quickly and writing in a professional, accessible way.

I hope that helps!

Hello!

A few resources below that I used / might be useful:
  • Definitive Guide to Law Firm Case Studies (whilst this is a case study, instead of a written exercise, I found it super useful last cycle!)
  • TCLA Written Exercises (a good way to practice if you are able to pay to access resources)
  • Some law firms upload example written exercises online - I believe DWF has one available!

Hopefully they help as a starting point - best of luck! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: qwerty!
Hi everyone! I'm wondering if anyone has any advice on a case study + presentation for an AC. From what I know, we'll prob have like 30 mins to prepare and then give a presentation to a partner before they ask questions. I've never done one before and have no clue how best to format it (ie to just organise by questions they ask in the handout or like your own format) and how to dedicate time to reviewing the materials and prepping the presentation during only like 30 mins

I would love to hear what's worked for people : ) thank you very much!
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hey!

I have previously written a few posts on negotiations, so I have quoted those below!

If it is a more debate-style exercise, I would say that the biggest thing to focus on is progressing the discussion, not just arguing your point.

Therefore, I'd try to frame your contributions around evaluating points (e.g. weighing pros and cons, discussing risk, and practicality) rather than just saying what you think. It helps to keep linking back to the objective (e.g. "which option best meets X?" as that shows that you are focused on the question, and have commercial awareness.

I'd also make sure that you engage direction with others. This could look like building on strong points, challenging ideas (respectfully!) and helping to move things forward if the conversation is getting stuck (e.g. suggesting that you narrow down to fewer options or summarise where you are).

Essentially, they'll be looking for someone who can think critically and help the group reach a sensible outcome, rather than someone who just debates for the sake of it.

Best of luck with the AC tomorrow!! :)
This is really helpful, thank you so much!
 
Hey!

Congratulations on the AC invite!

As someone who failed to convert a few vacation schemes last cycle, this is definitely something I worried about - however, I wasn't asked about my previous vacation schemes, so try not to stress too much about it!

The key is to frame the vacation scheme positively and reflectively. You don't need to go into details about not converting, as firms understand that there are many factors that go into those decisions. Instead, I would focus on what you gained from the scheme - e.g. the skills you developed, the exposure you had, and any moments that strengthened your motivations for commercial law.

It is also good to show self-awareness by reflecting on what you learned about yourself and what you have done since to improve (based on any feedback you received post-VS). I would focus on tangible steps that you have taken - for example, sharpening commercial awareness, building confidence in group settings, etc. This shows resilience and a willingness to learn, which are essential traits for a trainee!

If you are asked directly about not converting (which I never was!), I'd just keep it honest and avoid sounding defensive. You should focus on discussing how the experience has made you a stronger candidate now, and what you learned from it.

Good luck!! :)
ahhh thank you so much that's v helpful and reassuring :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
lol, from Teacher Stern

Thank you very much for your recent application, and for the interest you have shown in our firm.

Due to planned changes to our hiring strategy, we have made the difficult decision not to proceed with this year’s graduate recruitment process. As a result, we will unfortunately not be progressing applications for the 2026 Vacation Scheme and 2028 Training Contracts


Surely given that applications closed only a month ago these are "unplanned changes".
 
lol, from Teacher Stern

Thank you very much for your recent application, and for the interest you have shown in our firm.

Due to planned changes to our hiring strategy, we have made the difficult decision not to proceed with this year’s graduate recruitment process. As a result, we will unfortunately not be progressing applications for the 2026 Vacation Scheme and 2028 Training Contracts


Surely given that applications closed only a month ago these are "unplanned changes".
Totally convenient 🤣🤣
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.