True, commercial barristers do also need to take their clients' business interests/perspectives into consideration, so you'd have to draw a clearer distinction.
You could distinguish between the two by focusing on the work they actually do. Do you prefer managing the case, gathering evidence...
I think if you're asked a question like this, you have to probably hear it as 'why [do you want to practice (and not study) commercial] law'? That is, you can be more specific on why you want to work as a commercial solicitor and not, for example, a criminal solicitor (or even a barrister)...
I think it's definitely good practice to link it back to the firm. You're trying to show you would like to work there in particular, after all. If it's a question that specifies the "legal industry" then why wouldn't you link it back to the firm, a business that operates in that industry? ;)...
I think Dheepa is absolutely right about fitting things into the overall trend. The article she linked is good for oil, which seems like something you're focusing on. Definitely think about 'stranded assets', as the article mentions.
In addition to the above, here’s a video that was published...
Very helpful, thank you!
Not sure if I'm missing something - can I just ask why BCLP is shown under Jan 19th and then Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner under Jan 31st?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.