Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
A Guide to Building a Winning Application Strategy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 183728" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Hi there! Essentially this question blends in (i) why commercial law, (ii) why an apprenticeship specifically, rather than the TC route; and (iii) why this firm. Thus, you have the option to do three roughly 100 words paragraphs on each question or to write a longer one or two paragraphs interweaving the answers. I don't think there's a right or wrong approach here. It all depends on the specifics of your motivations for each section and your style of writing. </p><p></p><p>If your answers for each of the three questions are very easy to link, then you could write a single block of text in a more narrative-like style. The main benefits here would be the increased depth you can go into and the potentially more 'natural' reading experience. However, if your motivations are less interconnected, you could go for the simpler separate paragraphs approach. The main benefits of this will be that your answer will be easy to follow and have a clear structure. </p><p></p><p>If you are unsure about which approach to take and you are willing to invest more time in this application, you could write two drafts - one with the narrative structure, the other with the 3 separate points structure. Then you can compare them and decide which of them is better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 183728, member: 36777"] Hi there! Essentially this question blends in (i) why commercial law, (ii) why an apprenticeship specifically, rather than the TC route; and (iii) why this firm. Thus, you have the option to do three roughly 100 words paragraphs on each question or to write a longer one or two paragraphs interweaving the answers. I don't think there's a right or wrong approach here. It all depends on the specifics of your motivations for each section and your style of writing. If your answers for each of the three questions are very easy to link, then you could write a single block of text in a more narrative-like style. The main benefits here would be the increased depth you can go into and the potentially more 'natural' reading experience. However, if your motivations are less interconnected, you could go for the simpler separate paragraphs approach. The main benefits of this will be that your answer will be easy to follow and have a clear structure. If you are unsure about which approach to take and you are willing to invest more time in this application, you could write two drafts - one with the narrative structure, the other with the 3 separate points structure. Then you can compare them and decide which of them is better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
A Guide to Building a Winning Application Strategy
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…