Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
AC Case study structure advice.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hibah" data-source="post: 171417" data-attributes="member: 3145"><p>Hi guys, </p><p></p><p>I have a question on business case studies. I have one coming up on Monday, and I have looked through the sample guides on TCLA and brushed up on my financial terms etc. </p><p>I have a question on the structure. So for the AC, I have to give a 15-minute presentation, followed by a Q&A with Partners. I wondered if you had any advice on structuring my thoughts for the AC. </p><p></p><p>In a previous AC, I had received a bundle of information with some questions at the bottom- I was asked to give a brief presentation. If asked questions at the end of the bundle, would it make sense to structure my presentation as follows: </p><p>1. Summary of the issue at hand.</p><p>2. Key issues arising from the information. (PROS/CONS/RECOMMENDATIONS)</p><p>3. Addressing each question in turn. </p><p>4. Conclusion. </p><p></p><p>OR </p><p></p><p>would you use each question as a subheading and go through them in turn? AKA </p><p>1. Summary of the issue at hand.</p><p>2. Addressing question 1 from the bundle. </p><p>3. Addressing question 2 from the bundle etc. </p><p>4. Other considerations (AKA my personal evaluations). </p><p>5. Conclusion. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, I have been looking at some consulting videos on YouTube concerning M&A case studies, just because there aren't that many from law firms. Would this structure be useful for M&A scenarios? </p><p></p><p>1. Summary of the issue and aim. </p><p>2. Analysing the industry market. </p><p>3. Analysing the target company. </p><p>4. Analysing potential synergies/risks. </p><p>5. Recommendations. </p><p>6. Conclusion. </p><p></p><p>or should I forget about analysing the industry (it's likely there won't be any information on the competitors or how well the industry is doing anyway), and continue on focusing on just the target company and its opportunities and risks? </p><p></p><p>thanks for the help!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hibah, post: 171417, member: 3145"] Hi guys, I have a question on business case studies. I have one coming up on Monday, and I have looked through the sample guides on TCLA and brushed up on my financial terms etc. I have a question on the structure. So for the AC, I have to give a 15-minute presentation, followed by a Q&A with Partners. I wondered if you had any advice on structuring my thoughts for the AC. In a previous AC, I had received a bundle of information with some questions at the bottom- I was asked to give a brief presentation. If asked questions at the end of the bundle, would it make sense to structure my presentation as follows: 1. Summary of the issue at hand. 2. Key issues arising from the information. (PROS/CONS/RECOMMENDATIONS) 3. Addressing each question in turn. 4. Conclusion. OR would you use each question as a subheading and go through them in turn? AKA 1. Summary of the issue at hand. 2. Addressing question 1 from the bundle. 3. Addressing question 2 from the bundle etc. 4. Other considerations (AKA my personal evaluations). 5. Conclusion. Also, I have been looking at some consulting videos on YouTube concerning M&A case studies, just because there aren't that many from law firms. Would this structure be useful for M&A scenarios? 1. Summary of the issue and aim. 2. Analysing the industry market. 3. Analysing the target company. 4. Analysing potential synergies/risks. 5. Recommendations. 6. Conclusion. or should I forget about analysing the industry (it's likely there won't be any information on the competitors or how well the industry is doing anyway), and continue on focusing on just the target company and its opportunities and risks? thanks for the help! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
AC Case study structure advice.
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…