Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Answering 'Why Skadden?'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aditik" data-source="post: 7216" data-attributes="member: 300"><p>Hey guys!</p><p></p><p>So I am currently trying to complete and submit my Skadden application, and I am facing issues with answering 'Why Skadden?' in a satisfactory manner.</p><p></p><p>The main reasons for why I decided to apply to Skadden were:</p><p></p><p>1. The exceptional international arbitration practice (and some really cool deals such as their work representing South Sudan in an ICSID dispute against Sudapet, but I feel like this deal is so famous, nearly every other candidate will mention it?) rounded with a well-established corporate practice; this distinguishes it from some other U.S. firms in London, whose training contracts tend to be transactionally heavy.</p><p></p><p>2. The small trainee intake of around 10-12 each year; I like this because it means you may have a greater sense of community with your trainee cohort, more flexibility in tailoring the TC to your needs, and hopefully, greater levels of responsibility (though I realise that none of these are necessarily a given.)</p><p></p><p>I am not sure how to make my reasons more specific to Skadden. Anyone on this forum who has a bit to add? Or anyone who made it to the Skadden ac previously? </p><p>Thanks guys</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aditik, post: 7216, member: 300"] Hey guys! So I am currently trying to complete and submit my Skadden application, and I am facing issues with answering 'Why Skadden?' in a satisfactory manner. The main reasons for why I decided to apply to Skadden were: 1. The exceptional international arbitration practice (and some really cool deals such as their work representing South Sudan in an ICSID dispute against Sudapet, but I feel like this deal is so famous, nearly every other candidate will mention it?) rounded with a well-established corporate practice; this distinguishes it from some other U.S. firms in London, whose training contracts tend to be transactionally heavy. 2. The small trainee intake of around 10-12 each year; I like this because it means you may have a greater sense of community with your trainee cohort, more flexibility in tailoring the TC to your needs, and hopefully, greater levels of responsibility (though I realise that none of these are necessarily a given.) I am not sure how to make my reasons more specific to Skadden. Anyone on this forum who has a bit to add? Or anyone who made it to the Skadden ac previously? Thanks guys [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Answering 'Why Skadden?'
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…