Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Anyone qualified early as a solicitor via existing QWE + passing SQE1 & 2?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TCLA Community Assistant" data-source="post: 211423" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>My general advice is not to qualify until you know you have got an NQ role lined up, whether that is with your current firm or another organisation. The process is fairly quick with the SRA and if you qualify without an NQ role lined up, you risk being "over qualified" but "under experienced". This is one of the downsides of the SQE qualification process - the SRA's requirements are much lower than what firms expect, especially as the QWE requirement for the SRA is very basis (and a very low benchmark) while firms will value your experience more than anything else when thinking whether you are suitable for an NQ role.</p><p></p><p>People will not get push back from firms/employers if their QWE has given them exposure to NQ levels of responsibilities. The issue is that many looking to qualify via QWE over a TC won't have gained the necessary level of responsibilities to operate at the firm's/employer's expectations. I am hearing of people who are now qualified but are still in the paralegal roles they were in before qualifying. The organisation they are working for either doesn't have NQ roles or the firm does not see the individual operating at an NQ level. They also can struggle in applying for external roles if they are competing with NQs who have done a traditional TC and have had higher levels of responsibility.</p><p></p><p>Saying that, qualifying via QWE outside of a TC can work well. It can work well if your two years' experience is in one specialist area, especially if that area is in demand. If you have effectively been operating at a trainee/NQ level throughout the two years, then you can be an attractive candidate, both internally and externally. But you have to be confident that your experience is of that level.</p><p></p><p>I think it is generally easier to qualify in an existing role than it is to compete in the external market. To qualify internally, you need to have career development and performance conversations through appraisal and feedback systems to see whether the firm will be able to offer you an NQ role.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TCLA Community Assistant, post: 211423, member: 2672"] My general advice is not to qualify until you know you have got an NQ role lined up, whether that is with your current firm or another organisation. The process is fairly quick with the SRA and if you qualify without an NQ role lined up, you risk being "over qualified" but "under experienced". This is one of the downsides of the SQE qualification process - the SRA's requirements are much lower than what firms expect, especially as the QWE requirement for the SRA is very basis (and a very low benchmark) while firms will value your experience more than anything else when thinking whether you are suitable for an NQ role. People will not get push back from firms/employers if their QWE has given them exposure to NQ levels of responsibilities. The issue is that many looking to qualify via QWE over a TC won't have gained the necessary level of responsibilities to operate at the firm's/employer's expectations. I am hearing of people who are now qualified but are still in the paralegal roles they were in before qualifying. The organisation they are working for either doesn't have NQ roles or the firm does not see the individual operating at an NQ level. They also can struggle in applying for external roles if they are competing with NQs who have done a traditional TC and have had higher levels of responsibility. Saying that, qualifying via QWE outside of a TC can work well. It can work well if your two years' experience is in one specialist area, especially if that area is in demand. If you have effectively been operating at a trainee/NQ level throughout the two years, then you can be an attractive candidate, both internally and externally. But you have to be confident that your experience is of that level. I think it is generally easier to qualify in an existing role than it is to compete in the external market. To qualify internally, you need to have career development and performance conversations through appraisal and feedback systems to see whether the firm will be able to offer you an NQ role. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Anyone qualified early as a solicitor via existing QWE + passing SQE1 & 2?
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…