Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Applying for a training contract after 3/4 years as a mature candidate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TCinpipeline" data-source="post: 92169" data-attributes="member: 17355"><p>Thank you for your reply Jessica from a recruiter’s perspective.</p><p></p><p>I am not a paralegal (for financial commitments this would not be a viable option for me) but I have extensive experience as a legal PA at a top City law firm. The firm I work at takes on trainees with top A level grades (apart from the odd few that hasn’t for mitigating reasons). I don’t have top grades so those odds are against me. It also does not have many private client practice areas which I am interested in working in. I did an internship at a high street law firm to get an idea of how it contrasted with a City law firm. A high street law firm isn’t really for me personally. How do I mention this in applications without it coming across negative?</p><p></p><p>I have only just started embedding myself fully within the trainee solicitor recruitment process and thinking what type of firm/practice areas I want to work in. Having read quite a few experiences and spoken to a few candidates applying for training contracts, they have informed me it can take at least a year to get to grips with one step of the process then there is the saturated market we are applying into which doesn’t make the chances of securing a contract very high. I suspect these would be the main reasons why a lot of TCs are unsuccessful- is that not correct? In what ways can a candidate continue to stand out in applications if they have failed to get a TC? Is it by undertaking different work experience in the legal areas they wish to go on to practice into?</p><p></p><p>Would you recommend applying to as many firms as possible in that 3/4 year period so we are not questioned by recruitment as being in the market too long? From the trainee who got a TC after ten years, he stated sending lots of applications out is not a good idea as you lose the focus of the time and quality you would put in when only applying to a few.</p><p></p><p>Thank you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TCinpipeline, post: 92169, member: 17355"] Thank you for your reply Jessica from a recruiter’s perspective. I am not a paralegal (for financial commitments this would not be a viable option for me) but I have extensive experience as a legal PA at a top City law firm. The firm I work at takes on trainees with top A level grades (apart from the odd few that hasn’t for mitigating reasons). I don’t have top grades so those odds are against me. It also does not have many private client practice areas which I am interested in working in. I did an internship at a high street law firm to get an idea of how it contrasted with a City law firm. A high street law firm isn’t really for me personally. How do I mention this in applications without it coming across negative? I have only just started embedding myself fully within the trainee solicitor recruitment process and thinking what type of firm/practice areas I want to work in. Having read quite a few experiences and spoken to a few candidates applying for training contracts, they have informed me it can take at least a year to get to grips with one step of the process then there is the saturated market we are applying into which doesn’t make the chances of securing a contract very high. I suspect these would be the main reasons why a lot of TCs are unsuccessful- is that not correct? In what ways can a candidate continue to stand out in applications if they have failed to get a TC? Is it by undertaking different work experience in the legal areas they wish to go on to practice into? Would you recommend applying to as many firms as possible in that 3/4 year period so we are not questioned by recruitment as being in the market too long? From the trainee who got a TC after ten years, he stated sending lots of applications out is not a good idea as you lose the focus of the time and quality you would put in when only applying to a few. Thank you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Applying for a training contract after 3/4 years as a mature candidate
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…