Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask 3 future trainees (Magic & Silver Circle, International Elite) ANYTHING! *New TCLA Team Members*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jacob Miller" data-source="post: 51996" data-attributes="member: 5063"><p>I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with discussing trends rather than specific stories, so long as you know the necessary info in good depth and stuff. </p><p></p><p>I would personally err away from the Tesla stock price, as, in my opinion, it's much less of a legal issue and more of an investment issue - focus on issues which have legal implications. </p><p></p><p>I think you could definitely discuss stories and then bring the discussion 'out' to focus on a trend; this is a not-dissimilar approach to what I took where I would often discuss parallels between current issues and issues during the financial crisis (for example, comparisons between the government propping up banks in 07-08 vs not propping up Thomas Cook, etc). </p><p>Also- circling back to your initial question- I would go into a good bit of depth in the initial response, but don't go in with everything you know off the bat because it means that as soon as the interviewer asks a question it might be something you don't know. I would personally outline, say, 3 key issues in your initial response covering what is at the centre of the issue with some wider information, and then let the interviewer ask questions from there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jacob Miller, post: 51996, member: 5063"] I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with discussing trends rather than specific stories, so long as you know the necessary info in good depth and stuff. I would personally err away from the Tesla stock price, as, in my opinion, it's much less of a legal issue and more of an investment issue - focus on issues which have legal implications. I think you could definitely discuss stories and then bring the discussion 'out' to focus on a trend; this is a not-dissimilar approach to what I took where I would often discuss parallels between current issues and issues during the financial crisis (for example, comparisons between the government propping up banks in 07-08 vs not propping up Thomas Cook, etc). Also- circling back to your initial question- I would go into a good bit of depth in the initial response, but don't go in with everything you know off the bat because it means that as soon as the interviewer asks a question it might be something you don't know. I would personally outline, say, 3 key issues in your initial response covering what is at the centre of the issue with some wider information, and then let the interviewer ask questions from there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask 3 future trainees (Magic & Silver Circle, International Elite) ANYTHING! *New TCLA Team Members*
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…