Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask 4 future trainees ANYTHING! *New TCLA Team Members*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="futuretcholder" data-source="post: 182380" data-attributes="member: 35984"><p>Thank you [USER=36740]@Amma Usman[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] this was so helpful, I really appreciate iit</p><p>Do you guys have any advice when it comes to talking about a deal within the 'why commercial law' question? </p><p></p><p>In my last application I submitted for Sidley in August I talked about how "The firm’s representation of X in acquisition of X interested me, as it comprises 18 brands, with regulatory and antitrust considerations that can impact the transaction’s completion. Such high-profile, multifaceted transactions reflect the work that I aspire to engage in as a burgeoning lawyer at Sidley."</p><p></p><p>Now that I'm reading it back, I feel like its a little biit vague, I think I wanted to convey that Sidley works on. really complex deals like this one because the deal involved 18 brands, but I don't think it came across the way I intended to... (lol) I think it was a good start that i mentioned the regulatory issues but I could've mentioned how this has become more diffiuclt recently with harsher merger control conditions. How do I show that this deal makes this firm special? </p><p></p><p>I would be really grateful for any tips and advice</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="futuretcholder, post: 182380, member: 35984"] Thank you [USER=36740]@Amma Usman[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] this was so helpful, I really appreciate iit Do you guys have any advice when it comes to talking about a deal within the 'why commercial law' question? In my last application I submitted for Sidley in August I talked about how "The firm’s representation of X in acquisition of X interested me, as it comprises 18 brands, with regulatory and antitrust considerations that can impact the transaction’s completion. Such high-profile, multifaceted transactions reflect the work that I aspire to engage in as a burgeoning lawyer at Sidley." Now that I'm reading it back, I feel like its a little biit vague, I think I wanted to convey that Sidley works on. really complex deals like this one because the deal involved 18 brands, but I don't think it came across the way I intended to... (lol) I think it was a good start that i mentioned the regulatory issues but I could've mentioned how this has become more diffiuclt recently with harsher merger control conditions. How do I show that this deal makes this firm special? I would be really grateful for any tips and advice [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask 4 future trainees ANYTHING! *New TCLA Team Members*
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…