Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Amma Usman" data-source="post: 189754" data-attributes="member: 36740">Hey [USER=35580]@lawyersum[/USER] , thanks for the question. Just before [USER=36738]@Ram Sabaratnam[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] get back to you as well, I’ve included a few points below;<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Any situation you choose is fine. Ultimately, the weight and impact of your answer is dependent on your ability to appropriately describe the situation, your contributions to tackling the setback, and the result. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Both examples are outstanding, but I would personally go with the first. The reason is because I believe the reason is more unique to your experiences and interests, whereas I‘ve reviewed quite a few applications with event management being a core discussion to answers on questions of this type. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">In answering the first question, explain why you were rejected twice - this demonstrates self-awareness and heightens the impact of your ability to overcome the setback. The HR team will ideally want more detail on the setback itself. Further, why did you want to write a journal publication? What led you to choosing a more topical theme? What were these research and analysis methods you used? How were they different to what you used last time? What was the publication on? Is it on law/business? How can you briefly relate it to the role of a trainee solicitor/and(or) your ability to succeed in the role. Which legal organisation was this? Include this and show off your achievements. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">The STAR analysis will help you provide a clean structure for this answer.&nbsp;&nbsp; </li>
</ul>Goodluck!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Amma Usman, post: 189754, member: 36740"] Hey [USER=35580]@lawyersum[/USER] , thanks for the question. Just before [USER=36738]@Ram Sabaratnam[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] get back to you as well, I’ve included a few points below; [LIST] [*]Any situation you choose is fine. Ultimately, the weight and impact of your answer is dependent on your ability to appropriately describe the situation, your contributions to tackling the setback, and the result. [*]Both examples are outstanding, but I would personally go with the first. The reason is because I believe the reason is more unique to your experiences and interests, whereas I‘ve reviewed quite a few applications with event management being a core discussion to answers on questions of this type. [*]In answering the first question, explain why you were rejected twice - this demonstrates self-awareness and heightens the impact of your ability to overcome the setback. The HR team will ideally want more detail on the setback itself. Further, why did you want to write a journal publication? What led you to choosing a more topical theme? What were these research and analysis methods you used? How were they different to what you used last time? What was the publication on? Is it on law/business? How can you briefly relate it to the role of a trainee solicitor/and(or) your ability to succeed in the role. Which legal organisation was this? Include this and show off your achievements. [*]The STAR analysis will help you provide a clean structure for this answer. [/LIST] Goodluck! [/QUOTE]

Verification

Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Search

Search

Reply to thread