Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 46258" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>A sub par video interview won’t get you through to the next round. You would need to perform in it well enough to be put through to the next round otherwise there is no need for that stage. You have to remember by this point every application and test results are strong to have got through to the video interview stage - the weaker ones have already been selected out.</p><p></p><p>it’s slightly different in an assessment centre as there different things are assessed in more depth. For instance, if you have a written exercise that’s slightly weaker and they need to check whether there are any concerns on your verbal comprehension or written skills they could go back and look at your application or your verbal reasoning/WG test scores. But also competencies are assessed across assessment centres - you could be slightly weaker in team working in your interview, but make up for team working in a group exercise or vice versa.</p><p></p><p>But if you were weaker throughout your AC, again the standard is that high by that point that it cannot be compensated by your application or test scores as everyone else will have a similar standard of application and test scores and will have performed better in an AC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 46258, member: 2672"] A sub par video interview won’t get you through to the next round. You would need to perform in it well enough to be put through to the next round otherwise there is no need for that stage. You have to remember by this point every application and test results are strong to have got through to the video interview stage - the weaker ones have already been selected out. it’s slightly different in an assessment centre as there different things are assessed in more depth. For instance, if you have a written exercise that’s slightly weaker and they need to check whether there are any concerns on your verbal comprehension or written skills they could go back and look at your application or your verbal reasoning/WG test scores. But also competencies are assessed across assessment centres - you could be slightly weaker in team working in your interview, but make up for team working in a group exercise or vice versa. But if you were weaker throughout your AC, again the standard is that high by that point that it cannot be compensated by your application or test scores as everyone else will have a similar standard of application and test scores and will have performed better in an AC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…