Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TiredPG" data-source="post: 74746" data-attributes="member: 9578"><p>Hi Jessica</p><p></p><p>A firm I had an assessment centre with, for a vacation scheme, has encouraged me to re-apply for their training contract twice - in their initial PFO and when I asked for feedback. Both times stressed that my application for the vacation scheme was very strong. However, the application for the training contract is the same, albeit with one additional question. One of the repeated questions is: 'Tell us about a time you had a good idea'.</p><p></p><p>I haven't undertaken any new experiences since my vacation scheme application, given it was only a few months ago. The only substantive difference I can think to include is my motivations for wanting to join the firm being strengthened post-AC. I'm curious as to how much difference would be expected between the two applications and questions that are the same, and was wondering if you had any thoughts?</p><p></p><p>Thank you!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TiredPG, post: 74746, member: 9578"] Hi Jessica A firm I had an assessment centre with, for a vacation scheme, has encouraged me to re-apply for their training contract twice - in their initial PFO and when I asked for feedback. Both times stressed that my application for the vacation scheme was very strong. However, the application for the training contract is the same, albeit with one additional question. One of the repeated questions is: 'Tell us about a time you had a good idea'. I haven't undertaken any new experiences since my vacation scheme application, given it was only a few months ago. The only substantive difference I can think to include is my motivations for wanting to join the firm being strengthened post-AC. I'm curious as to how much difference would be expected between the two applications and questions that are the same, and was wondering if you had any thoughts? Thank you!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…