Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 89578" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>I’ll be frank. On an application a graduate recruiter doesn't really think about whether the research task was interesting or not. They just care that you did it. They know you will be given boring tasks in you role and therefore how interesting your past experience is, isn't really relevant. They just want to know you’d do a good job no matter how interesting or not the task was.</p><p></p><p>Think about it more in terms of what is transferable. If you are applying to a firm with a strong airline sector, you’d focus on on that task. If you were applying to a firm with a compulsory tax seat, you'd highlight that task.</p><p></p><p>For the capitalisation, it depends on how you are writing it. In the vast majority of cases, it won't be capitalised, but there are some exceptions. This article explains it well:</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/capitalization/capitalization-of-job-titles.html[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 89578, member: 2672"] I’ll be frank. On an application a graduate recruiter doesn't really think about whether the research task was interesting or not. They just care that you did it. They know you will be given boring tasks in you role and therefore how interesting your past experience is, isn't really relevant. They just want to know you’d do a good job no matter how interesting or not the task was. Think about it more in terms of what is transferable. If you are applying to a firm with a strong airline sector, you’d focus on on that task. If you were applying to a firm with a compulsory tax seat, you'd highlight that task. For the capitalisation, it depends on how you are writing it. In the vast majority of cases, it won't be capitalised, but there are some exceptions. This article explains it well: [URL unfurl="true"]https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/capitalization/capitalization-of-job-titles.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…