Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask Jaysen (TCLA's Founder) Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 28511" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>You are right in that if a US firm states they recruit the majority of candidates through its vacation scheme, it's going to be trickier on paper because you're competing for a smaller number of places. This doesn't necessarily mean it's a waste of time though; if there's a US firm you particularly want to secure a training contract with and you can't afford to wait until the next vacation scheme round, then it's something to consider, especially if you feel confident in your own profile.</p><p></p><p>There was at least one trainee in my Weil intake who made it through by a direct training contract application. I believe at the time of applying she had a couple of vacation schemes behind here.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I imagine if a firm likes you but can't offer you a place, they'll consider moving you to a different intake or give you a vacation scheme offer instead. This happened to a candidate I mock interviewed last year, who was placed on the Cleary winter vacation scheme despite interviewing for a direct training contract.</p><p></p><p>Nothing wrong with your choice of firms there, just be prepared to have a well-justified answer at interview as to why you applied for vacation schemes at those firms (and how the current US firm differs).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 28511, member: 1"] You are right in that if a US firm states they recruit the majority of candidates through its vacation scheme, it's going to be trickier on paper because you're competing for a smaller number of places. This doesn't necessarily mean it's a waste of time though; if there's a US firm you particularly want to secure a training contract with and you can't afford to wait until the next vacation scheme round, then it's something to consider, especially if you feel confident in your own profile. There was at least one trainee in my Weil intake who made it through by a direct training contract application. I believe at the time of applying she had a couple of vacation schemes behind here. Personally, I imagine if a firm likes you but can't offer you a place, they'll consider moving you to a different intake or give you a vacation scheme offer instead. This happened to a candidate I mock interviewed last year, who was placed on the Cleary winter vacation scheme despite interviewing for a direct training contract. Nothing wrong with your choice of firms there, just be prepared to have a well-justified answer at interview as to why you applied for vacation schemes at those firms (and how the current US firm differs). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask Jaysen (TCLA's Founder) Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…