Normal
[USER=4098]@futuretraineesolicitor[/USER] I completely agree with the detailed explanation provided by [USER=17165]@George Maxwell[/USER]! My only add-on is that simply put, the statement contradicts the information provided enough for it to be 'probably false' but insufficiently for it to be definitely 'false'. My first instinct was to go with false as well, but then something kicked in reminding me that WG tests generally need you to be very precise. So if you have even a slight doubt about whether something is definitely false then it's always better to stick with probably false, which I pivoted to eventually with this question.Lastly, very well done for posting here in the forum and seeking support- it's very admirable 👏 👏 👏Please do reach out to us if you have any other questions!
[USER=4098]@futuretraineesolicitor[/USER] I completely agree with the detailed explanation provided by [USER=17165]@George Maxwell[/USER]! My only add-on is that simply put, the statement contradicts the information provided enough for it to be 'probably false' but insufficiently for it to be definitely 'false'. My first instinct was to go with false as well, but then something kicked in reminding me that WG tests generally need you to be very precise. So if you have even a slight doubt about whether something is definitely false then it's always better to stick with probably false, which I pivoted to eventually with this question.
Lastly, very well done for posting here in the forum and seeking support- it's very admirable 👏 👏 👏Please do reach out to us if you have any other questions!
