Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Vacation Schemes Discussion
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Application Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BC2000" data-source="post: 3637" data-attributes="member: 51"><p>Hi Bugsy,</p><p></p><p>I am wary as to posting my entire answer but as a brief general rule I approached it mostly in the same manner as a Why BCLP question plus including some indication as to career ambition.</p><p></p><p>So my particular model that I use is to identify area of interest(for me, litigation/contentious practice) and then hone in on their reputation, strategy and culture. I dedicate most of the word count to the first two, using things like Legal500 rankings and significant lateral hires. In BCLP's case, you almost certainly must include something about tech, their entrepenuerial practices and the fact that they fully merged(brand wise and financially) which is quite rare and indicates the commitment of the partnership to the new firm. This has noteably caused some disruption as can be seen by the several lateral departures, but this is almost inevitable when merging two firms with quite different cultures/financial results. In regards to culture, I just said relatively small intake, lots of responsibility etc. Perhaps name some diversity initiatives and why that attracts you to the firm(if that is relevant to you).</p><p></p><p>Format:</p><p></p><p>The firm’s strength in Litigation and Corporate risk, its medium-sized intake and strategic vision.</p><p></p><p>Rep - rankings, significant hires, major cases/deals.</p><p></p><p>Strategy - merger, tech investment, Manchester service centre. Good to say these investments are allowing lawyers to concentrate on the law, not menial work.</p><p></p><p>Culture/general - intake size, diverse range of seats, responsiblity, diversity initiatives.</p><p></p><p>Ambition: It should be clear from your answer what practice area(s) you want to go into.</p><p></p><p>Good luck, I will post my full answer up once I have completed the process.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: And as a side note, remember to link each of these facts into why the firm. E.G. Want to work in investigations - "The firm’s strategic focus on growing its litigation department through hires such as Mukul Chawla QC demonstrates how BCLP is aligning with my interest in investigations."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BC2000, post: 3637, member: 51"] Hi Bugsy, I am wary as to posting my entire answer but as a brief general rule I approached it mostly in the same manner as a Why BCLP question plus including some indication as to career ambition. So my particular model that I use is to identify area of interest(for me, litigation/contentious practice) and then hone in on their reputation, strategy and culture. I dedicate most of the word count to the first two, using things like Legal500 rankings and significant lateral hires. In BCLP's case, you almost certainly must include something about tech, their entrepenuerial practices and the fact that they fully merged(brand wise and financially) which is quite rare and indicates the commitment of the partnership to the new firm. This has noteably caused some disruption as can be seen by the several lateral departures, but this is almost inevitable when merging two firms with quite different cultures/financial results. In regards to culture, I just said relatively small intake, lots of responsibility etc. Perhaps name some diversity initiatives and why that attracts you to the firm(if that is relevant to you). Format: The firm’s strength in Litigation and Corporate risk, its medium-sized intake and strategic vision. Rep - rankings, significant hires, major cases/deals. Strategy - merger, tech investment, Manchester service centre. Good to say these investments are allowing lawyers to concentrate on the law, not menial work. Culture/general - intake size, diverse range of seats, responsiblity, diversity initiatives. Ambition: It should be clear from your answer what practice area(s) you want to go into. Good luck, I will post my full answer up once I have completed the process. EDIT: And as a side note, remember to link each of these facts into why the firm. E.G. Want to work in investigations - "The firm’s strategic focus on growing its litigation department through hires such as Mukul Chawla QC demonstrates how BCLP is aligning with my interest in investigations." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Vacation Schemes Discussion
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Application Questions
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…