Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Call for commercial awareness topics!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ADKM" data-source="post: 146406" data-attributes="member: 25667"><p>Hi Jake. Thanks for your opinion. They offer so much more insight. Also, thank you for your interview tips, I shall keep this in mind for the future.</p><p></p><p>I do agree with what you have to say. In fact, the point you picked up about AI affecting deal volumes is one that caught me eye particularly when there have been interesting developments in this realm. For example, Nvidia agreeing to become an anchor investor for Arm is a news I recently came across. In one of my previous applications, I mentioned Nvidia’s growth when it crossed $1 trillion in market cap. It indicates that market players/potential investors can enter into collaborations with Nvidia to understand more about Generative AI chips (apparently Nvidia is the only company that manufactures these chips, correct me if I’m wrong though!). So I can see the link between this news and AI deal volumes (might not be substantial, but a possibility nonetheless) which means work for M&A/PE lawyers. </p><p></p><p>Apologies if my wording about the regulation aspect was unclear but I agree with what you said about lawyers advising on the regulatory aspect of AI rather than outrightly drafting them. FYI, the FTC has pulled up OpenAI regarding the ambiguity of information coming out of ChatGPT, so your argument makes much more sense. </p><p></p><p>The IMF have said the global economic outlook looks slightly better (I’m presuming BoE, Fed & ECB) may make few more interest rate hikes in the coming weeks before we can see a substantial improvement. Regardless, this slight positive outlook, UK inflation going down by 7.9% and the news of PacWest and Banc of California merging along with Google exceeding expectations to hit top market cap makes the situation so much more interesting. With global M&A deal making at an all time low, these pieces tell me that borrowing costs could potentially lower in the foreseeable future increasing consumer spending. In between all this, if AI can be regulated it would make it very interesting from commercial law’s viewpoint. </p><p></p><p>Therefore, my question to you is how do you expect these pieces to affect the future? Do you think the market is headed for an uptick or are these temporary signs of growth simply just noise? Would love to know your thoughts on this!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ADKM, post: 146406, member: 25667"] Hi Jake. Thanks for your opinion. They offer so much more insight. Also, thank you for your interview tips, I shall keep this in mind for the future. I do agree with what you have to say. In fact, the point you picked up about AI affecting deal volumes is one that caught me eye particularly when there have been interesting developments in this realm. For example, Nvidia agreeing to become an anchor investor for Arm is a news I recently came across. In one of my previous applications, I mentioned Nvidia’s growth when it crossed $1 trillion in market cap. It indicates that market players/potential investors can enter into collaborations with Nvidia to understand more about Generative AI chips (apparently Nvidia is the only company that manufactures these chips, correct me if I’m wrong though!). So I can see the link between this news and AI deal volumes (might not be substantial, but a possibility nonetheless) which means work for M&A/PE lawyers. Apologies if my wording about the regulation aspect was unclear but I agree with what you said about lawyers advising on the regulatory aspect of AI rather than outrightly drafting them. FYI, the FTC has pulled up OpenAI regarding the ambiguity of information coming out of ChatGPT, so your argument makes much more sense. The IMF have said the global economic outlook looks slightly better (I’m presuming BoE, Fed & ECB) may make few more interest rate hikes in the coming weeks before we can see a substantial improvement. Regardless, this slight positive outlook, UK inflation going down by 7.9% and the news of PacWest and Banc of California merging along with Google exceeding expectations to hit top market cap makes the situation so much more interesting. With global M&A deal making at an all time low, these pieces tell me that borrowing costs could potentially lower in the foreseeable future increasing consumer spending. In between all this, if AI can be regulated it would make it very interesting from commercial law’s viewpoint. Therefore, my question to you is how do you expect these pieces to affect the future? Do you think the market is headed for an uptick or are these temporary signs of growth simply just noise? Would love to know your thoughts on this! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Call for commercial awareness topics!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…