Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Career Switcher - paralegal to TC route or direct to TC?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ram Sabaratnam" data-source="post: 212850" data-attributes="member: 36738"><p>Hiya [USER=40820]@Versarchiama[/USER] </p><p></p><p></p><p>That's such a thoughtful post - and congratulations on your pregnancy! I think [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] [USER=36740]@Amma Usman[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] would have more to say here, but I'll just add my own suggestions here for now. </p><p></p><p>First, I just want to emphasise that career changers absolutely DO succeed in securing training contracts. Many firms genuinely value applicants who bring a broader range of experiences and perspectives. Your background in R&D, contract negotiation, and working with academic and charitable institutions is highly relevant to a number of firms' practice areas, particularly those that specialise in life sciences, tech, and even patent and IP matters. I think it may be worth emphasising here that you should draw on those experiences when preparing your application. </p><p></p><p>That leads to my second point. I'd strongly encourage you to consider how you go about prioritising firms and considering which firms you may have a strategic advantage in applying to. In particular, you may want to prioritise firms where your existing experience will valued. I know of various firms (e.g., Bird & Bird, Bristows, Goodwin, Osborne Clarke, and Taylor Wessing) that have been very receptive to candidates with STEM backgrounds, including those who may have little legal experience. Some firms even offer TC routes specifically to candidates with STEM backgrounds. </p><p></p><p>It’s important to note that ‘legal experience’ doesn’t need to mean vacation schemes or paralegaling alone. Attending firm open days, insight schemes, and legal events, and even arranging informal coffee chats with lawyers or others in your network can all contribute meaningfully to your understanding of the profession and demonstrate that you are making an informed decision. In fact, many successful career changers build their experience this way, especially when balancing other commitments.</p><p></p><p>As for whether you should apply for TCs directly or go via the paralegal route, I think both of these can be valid routes to qualifying (particularly since the SQE). However, I'd recommend thinking carefully about qualifying through the paralegal route, since there are often concerns about paralegals being able to secure associate roles if they choose to qualify in this way (as opposed to the traditional TC route). </p><p></p><p>Finally, pursuing the PGDL during your maternity leave could be a very pragmatic step. It may help open up more opportunities (including for some paralegal roles), and could show future employers your commitment to the career change. Many firms will sponsor future study, so completing the PGDL is not a prerequisite to applying for TCs, but starting it could potentially widen your options.</p><p></p><p>One last suggestion: I’d strongly recommend engaging with organisations like Aspiring Solicitors or similar groups that support career changers. Their events and mentoring schemes can provide valuable insights and help you understand the nuances of the legal market. Their events were invaluable to me, particularly since I was a career changer myself. </p><p></p><p>Good luck with any applications!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ram Sabaratnam, post: 212850, member: 36738"] Hiya [USER=40820]@Versarchiama[/USER] That's such a thoughtful post - and congratulations on your pregnancy! I think [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] [USER=36740]@Amma Usman[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] would have more to say here, but I'll just add my own suggestions here for now. First, I just want to emphasise that career changers absolutely DO succeed in securing training contracts. Many firms genuinely value applicants who bring a broader range of experiences and perspectives. Your background in R&D, contract negotiation, and working with academic and charitable institutions is[I] [/I]highly relevant to a number of firms' practice areas, particularly those that specialise in life sciences, tech, and even patent and IP matters. I think it may be worth emphasising here that you should draw on those experiences when preparing your application. That leads to my second point. I'd strongly encourage you to consider how you go about prioritising firms and considering which firms you may have a strategic advantage in applying to. In particular, you may want to prioritise firms where your existing experience will valued. I know of various firms (e.g., Bird & Bird, Bristows, Goodwin, Osborne Clarke, and Taylor Wessing) that have been very receptive to candidates with STEM backgrounds, including those who may have little legal experience. Some firms even offer TC routes specifically to candidates with STEM backgrounds. It’s important to note that ‘legal experience’ doesn’t need to mean vacation schemes or paralegaling alone. Attending firm open days, insight schemes, and legal events, and even arranging informal coffee chats with lawyers or others in your network can all contribute meaningfully to your understanding of the profession and demonstrate that you are making an informed decision. In fact, many successful career changers build their experience this way, especially when balancing other commitments. As for whether you should apply for TCs directly or go via the paralegal route, I think both of these can be valid routes to qualifying (particularly since the SQE). However, I'd recommend thinking carefully about qualifying through the paralegal route, since there are often concerns about paralegals being able to secure associate roles if they choose to qualify in this way (as opposed to the traditional TC route). Finally, pursuing the PGDL during your maternity leave could be a very pragmatic step. It may help open up more opportunities (including for some paralegal roles), and could show future employers your commitment to the career change. Many firms will sponsor future study, so completing the PGDL is not a prerequisite to applying for TCs, but starting it could potentially widen your options. One last suggestion: I’d strongly recommend engaging with organisations like Aspiring Solicitors or similar groups that support career changers. Their events and mentoring schemes can provide valuable insights and help you understand the nuances of the legal market. Their events were invaluable to me, particularly since I was a career changer myself. Good luck with any applications! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Career Switcher - paralegal to TC route or direct to TC?
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…