Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
case study help
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dheepa" data-source="post: 60144" data-attributes="member: 1572"><p>Hi Jennifer,</p><p></p><p>Non-compete/non-solicit clauses are typically part of the original employment contract. Whether or not the clause is enforceable when an employee leaves is a whole other question and depends on various factors, like the time limit for the non-compete, whether the non-compete is protecting the business etc.</p><p></p><p>If I was advising the Buyer, I'd negotiate or ask for a warranty to be included in the SPA that no key employee can terminate their contract because of the sale (i.e. no employment contracts with those key employees are subject to a change of control clause).</p><p></p><p>Just to give you some additional context, change of control clauses essentially give employees the right to terminate or renegotiate the employment contract should the ownership of the company change. So advising the Buyer to ask for that warranty I mentioned above will oblige the Seller to ensure that no employee the Buyer might want to keep on post-acquisition can even terminate their employment contracts to begin with.</p><p></p><p>I think its important to remember that if the employee is so important that the Buyer needs to be concerned about them working for competitors if they were to leave, there is a high chance that the Buyer would actually rather incentivise them to stay with the company and retain that intellectual capital to help with the business post-acquisition. While the warranty may help mitigate the ability of the employee to leave simply because of the sale, I'd also advise the Buyer to sit down and negotiate with said employee to remain in the company.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dheepa, post: 60144, member: 1572"] Hi Jennifer, Non-compete/non-solicit clauses are typically part of the original employment contract. Whether or not the clause is enforceable when an employee leaves is a whole other question and depends on various factors, like the time limit for the non-compete, whether the non-compete is protecting the business etc. If I was advising the Buyer, I'd negotiate or ask for a warranty to be included in the SPA that no key employee can terminate their contract because of the sale (i.e. no employment contracts with those key employees are subject to a change of control clause). Just to give you some additional context, change of control clauses essentially give employees the right to terminate or renegotiate the employment contract should the ownership of the company change. So advising the Buyer to ask for that warranty I mentioned above will oblige the Seller to ensure that no employee the Buyer might want to keep on post-acquisition can even terminate their employment contracts to begin with. I think its important to remember that if the employee is so important that the Buyer needs to be concerned about them working for competitors if they were to leave, there is a high chance that the Buyer would actually rather incentivise them to stay with the company and retain that intellectual capital to help with the business post-acquisition. While the warranty may help mitigate the ability of the employee to leave simply because of the sale, I'd also advise the Buyer to sit down and negotiate with said employee to remain in the company. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
case study help
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…