Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Case study - Limited partnership or private fund limited partnership?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="achramore" data-source="post: 7867" data-attributes="member: 582"><p>Hi,</p><p>I am currently working on a research task for my interview at a law firm next week.</p><p></p><p>The scenario is that a private funds client in the States is setting up a new fund structure in a couple of different countries and is considering adding a limited partnership/private fund limited partnership.</p><p></p><p>Now I need to give a recommendation to the client advising them whether to set it up as a traditional LP or a PFLP. I also need to include the advantages of using each of these vehicles.</p><p></p><p>I understand that the new PFLP is much more flexible as it reduces the administrative burden and also can give the limited partners more rights.</p><p></p><p>However, the whitelist does not guarantee LPs any actual new powers over the fund - it is still up to the investors and managers to commercially agree on the inclusion of such power in the contract in the first place.</p><p></p><p>I would definitely recommend the client to go ahead with the Private fund LP and cannot really see any advantage that the LP has over the Private fund LP. </p><p></p><p>Am I missing out on an important point here?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="achramore, post: 7867, member: 582"] Hi, I am currently working on a research task for my interview at a law firm next week. The scenario is that a private funds client in the States is setting up a new fund structure in a couple of different countries and is considering adding a limited partnership/private fund limited partnership. Now I need to give a recommendation to the client advising them whether to set it up as a traditional LP or a PFLP. I also need to include the advantages of using each of these vehicles. I understand that the new PFLP is much more flexible as it reduces the administrative burden and also can give the limited partners more rights. However, the whitelist does not guarantee LPs any actual new powers over the fund - it is still up to the investors and managers to commercially agree on the inclusion of such power in the contract in the first place. I would definitely recommend the client to go ahead with the Private fund LP and cannot really see any advantage that the LP has over the Private fund LP. Am I missing out on an important point here? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Case study - Limited partnership or private fund limited partnership?
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…