Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Choosing a TC start date
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 95319" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>A traditional TC was pretty much guaranteed employment for two years - firms don’t have things like probationary periods in LPC TCs because the commitment was two years of training with one employer. Only things like misconduct would have really allowed a firm to terminate your TC (or the firm going bust). The TC was attached to your employer (they were regulated) as much as it was tied to you as an employee and that gave trainees a range of protections.</p><p></p><p>With the SQE, firms are no longer regulated as training providers. You can also qualify by gaining qualifying work experience with multiple employers, and so a firm has no requirement to keep you on (like they currently do) as ultimately you could still qualify with another organisation. The qualification process is solely with you as an individual. It’s not attached to the firm in anyway.</p><p></p><p>So I would expect firms to be much more like the investment banks and professional services firms who recruit graduates, and start to have probation periods in employment contracts. They could technically make you redundant too if they wanted to - something that would be almost impossible for them to do now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 95319, member: 2672"] A traditional TC was pretty much guaranteed employment for two years - firms don’t have things like probationary periods in LPC TCs because the commitment was two years of training with one employer. Only things like misconduct would have really allowed a firm to terminate your TC (or the firm going bust). The TC was attached to your employer (they were regulated) as much as it was tied to you as an employee and that gave trainees a range of protections. With the SQE, firms are no longer regulated as training providers. You can also qualify by gaining qualifying work experience with multiple employers, and so a firm has no requirement to keep you on (like they currently do) as ultimately you could still qualify with another organisation. The qualification process is solely with you as an individual. It’s not attached to the firm in anyway. So I would expect firms to be much more like the investment banks and professional services firms who recruit graduates, and start to have probation periods in employment contracts. They could technically make you redundant too if they wanted to - something that would be almost impossible for them to do now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Choosing a TC start date
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…