Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Clifford Chance TC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M777" data-source="post: 33040" data-attributes="member: 2524"><p>I believe they've taken an assortment of other cost-cutting measures such as slashing NQ salaries (although I'm not sure if this is temporary), and as you point out, they've scrapped the vacation schemes. I'd be interested to know if the decision has any rationales beyond cost-cutting. It might involve the SQE (I don't know enough about the SQE to comment), but wasn't the SQE designed to make legal recruitment more streamlined and inclusive?</p><p></p><p>As you rightly point out, it seems inconsistent on its face both with D&I objectives and the regulatory aims you've highlighted above. I believe Ms. Booker and a few other people from the forum have contacted them to find out why they've changed the process this year, so I'm keen to find out more!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M777, post: 33040, member: 2524"] I believe they've taken an assortment of other cost-cutting measures such as slashing NQ salaries (although I'm not sure if this is temporary), and as you point out, they've scrapped the vacation schemes. I'd be interested to know if the decision has any rationales beyond cost-cutting. It might involve the SQE (I don't know enough about the SQE to comment), but wasn't the SQE designed to make legal recruitment more streamlined and inclusive? As you rightly point out, it seems inconsistent on its face both with D&I objectives and the regulatory aims you've highlighted above. I believe Ms. Booker and a few other people from the forum have contacted them to find out why they've changed the process this year, so I'm keen to find out more! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Clifford Chance TC
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…