Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Commercial Awareness - April 2018
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 603" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>I agree with a lot of this. At this point I think a domestic listing is almost certain but I'm becoming less convinced that we'll also see an international listing. It seems very risky, especially if they're relying on the funds for the country's economic reforms.</p><p></p><p>If they do go for a dual listing, I'm still undecided on the venue choice. I would still say New York is a priority. It's just a much bigger market and has many beneficial political implications - which is just as important as the financial benefit, if not more. But at this stage I agree that it won't happen unless they get concessions. It's too dangerous to list and then get stuck defending your company in court.</p><p></p><p>Yes we seem to be really bending backwards to court the company. The FCA proposals to allow state owned enterprises to get a premium listing is quite substantial and that's on top of the already light-touch regulations that we have. If we do get it, it would be huge for May - boosting the reputation of the LSE whilst Brexit is going on and potentially attracting more state owned enterprises, so I see why she's doing it. It's a good example of how economic interests influence political agendas.</p><p></p><p>On the Trump side, so far I've only seen him tweet: <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/926793510723796993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fqz.com%2F1124971%2Flondon-could-lose-the-saudi-aramco-ipo-to-new-york-because-of-britains-dysfunction%2F&tfw_creator=johndetrixhe&tfw_site=qz" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/926793510723796993?ref_src=twsrc^tfw&ref_url=https://qz.com/1124971/london-could-lose-the-saudi-aramco-ipo-to-new-york-because-of-britains-dysfunction/&tfw_creator=johndetrixhe&tfw_site=qz</a>. Although he does seem keen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 603, member: 1"] I agree with a lot of this. At this point I think a domestic listing is almost certain but I'm becoming less convinced that we'll also see an international listing. It seems very risky, especially if they're relying on the funds for the country's economic reforms. If they do go for a dual listing, I'm still undecided on the venue choice. I would still say New York is a priority. It's just a much bigger market and has many beneficial political implications - which is just as important as the financial benefit, if not more. But at this stage I agree that it won't happen unless they get concessions. It's too dangerous to list and then get stuck defending your company in court. Yes we seem to be really bending backwards to court the company. The FCA proposals to allow state owned enterprises to get a premium listing is quite substantial and that's on top of the already light-touch regulations that we have. If we do get it, it would be huge for May - boosting the reputation of the LSE whilst Brexit is going on and potentially attracting more state owned enterprises, so I see why she's doing it. It's a good example of how economic interests influence political agendas. On the Trump side, so far I've only seen him tweet: [URL='https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/926793510723796993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fqz.com%2F1124971%2Flondon-could-lose-the-saudi-aramco-ipo-to-new-york-because-of-britains-dysfunction%2F&tfw_creator=johndetrixhe&tfw_site=qz']https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/926793510723796993?ref_src=twsrc^tfw&ref_url=https://qz.com/1124971/london-could-lose-the-saudi-aramco-ipo-to-new-york-because-of-britains-dysfunction/&tfw_creator=johndetrixhe&tfw_site=qz[/URL]. Although he does seem keen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Commercial Awareness - April 2018
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…