Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Ropes & Gray:
What do Private Equity Lawyers Actually Do?
— Wed 14 Jan 2026, 5–6pm (UK), Zoom
Register →
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Commercial awareness resources: collated list of pros and cons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shane" data-source="post: 5687" data-attributes="member: 267"><p>Hi guys,</p><p></p><p>Didn't know what thread was appropriate to post this in, but here I go anyways.</p><p></p><p>I am applying to Clyde and co and I have picked their incredible capability for dispute resolution in emerging markets as a reason of why I am interested in applying to the firm. I would just like to get your opinions on why it is more challenging to to resolve disputes in emerging markets and why such work may be more interesting than maybe in mature markets.</p><p></p><p>I originally was thinking that factors such as political instability and governmental interference into the judicial process would be a challenge. However, this would only be regards litigation and most of these disputes are usually arbitrated.</p><p></p><p> I want to be able to answer why "I" would enjoy working on multi-jurisdictional disputes involving emerging markets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shane, post: 5687, member: 267"] Hi guys, Didn't know what thread was appropriate to post this in, but here I go anyways. I am applying to Clyde and co and I have picked their incredible capability for dispute resolution in emerging markets as a reason of why I am interested in applying to the firm. I would just like to get your opinions on why it is more challenging to to resolve disputes in emerging markets and why such work may be more interesting than maybe in mature markets. I originally was thinking that factors such as political instability and governmental interference into the judicial process would be a challenge. However, this would only be regards litigation and most of these disputes are usually arbitrated. I want to be able to answer why "I" would enjoy working on multi-jurisdictional disputes involving emerging markets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Commercial awareness resources: collated list of pros and cons
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…