Normal
Hi guys,Didn't know what thread was appropriate to post this in, but here I go anyways.I am applying to Clyde and co and I have picked their incredible capability for dispute resolution in emerging markets as a reason of why I am interested in applying to the firm. I would just like to get your opinions on why it is more challenging to to resolve disputes in emerging markets and why such work may be more interesting than maybe in mature markets.I originally was thinking that factors such as political instability and governmental interference into the judicial process would be a challenge. However, this would only be regards litigation and most of these disputes are usually arbitrated. I want to be able to answer why "I" would enjoy working on multi-jurisdictional disputes involving emerging markets.
Hi guys,
Didn't know what thread was appropriate to post this in, but here I go anyways.
I am applying to Clyde and co and I have picked their incredible capability for dispute resolution in emerging markets as a reason of why I am interested in applying to the firm. I would just like to get your opinions on why it is more challenging to to resolve disputes in emerging markets and why such work may be more interesting than maybe in mature markets.
I originally was thinking that factors such as political instability and governmental interference into the judicial process would be a challenge. However, this would only be regards litigation and most of these disputes are usually arbitrated.
I want to be able to answer why "I" would enjoy working on multi-jurisdictional disputes involving emerging markets.