Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Commercial Discussion 2026
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Pearson - Managing Director" data-source="post: 241806" data-attributes="member: 39846"><p>I've been away for a while but I really wanted to discuss the tensions between China and the USA. For years, several anti-China politicians have been advocating for a decoupling - and now, with Trump in power, it seems their wishes have been fulfilled. However, as Trump also agitates allies, Carney (Canadian PM) has signed a trade deal with China. Trump, as usual, has oscillated between being against it and being for it, most recently declaring that if the deal goes forward Canada will be subject to 100% tariffs. </p><p></p><p>Now, Starmer has landed in China and may be going ahead with a trade deal. Simultaneously, India and the EU signed a deal between themselves. All this is key as it seems to signal a massive trade shift away from the instability of the US towards more stable allies. </p><p></p><p>Several mutterings have been around about also moving away from US tech giants with the French government announcing an alternative to Zoom for gov't employees. </p><p></p><p>All of this is interesting on a global scale, especially for firms that specialise in international work (most of them being US firms).</p><p></p><p><strong>What do you think?</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Pearson - Managing Director, post: 241806, member: 39846"] I've been away for a while but I really wanted to discuss the tensions between China and the USA. For years, several anti-China politicians have been advocating for a decoupling - and now, with Trump in power, it seems their wishes have been fulfilled. However, as Trump also agitates allies, Carney (Canadian PM) has signed a trade deal with China. Trump, as usual, has oscillated between being against it and being for it, most recently declaring that if the deal goes forward Canada will be subject to 100% tariffs. Now, Starmer has landed in China and may be going ahead with a trade deal. Simultaneously, India and the EU signed a deal between themselves. All this is key as it seems to signal a massive trade shift away from the instability of the US towards more stable allies. Several mutterings have been around about also moving away from US tech giants with the French government announcing an alternative to Zoom for gov't employees. All of this is interesting on a global scale, especially for firms that specialise in international work (most of them being US firms). [B]What do you think?[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Commercial Discussion 2026
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…