Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Contacting HR over possible errors in test
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M&amp;ALawyer" data-source="post: 43314" data-attributes="member: 2647"><p>I recently completed a verbal reasoning test for a well known City firm. This test had ambiguously worded questions, which led to multiple potential answers. I have researched the definitions used for words in the questions, and consulted others - and I am confident in my evaluation. I would like to reiterate this is over the choice of words in the question - rather than the material itself. </p><p></p><p>I have probably completed 50+ of these verbal reasoning/Watson Glaser tests, and not had any issues with the wording of the questions previously. To my knowledge, this test appeared to be designed in-house rather than a company such as Pearson. </p><p></p><p>I am considering writing to HR, explaining with clear examples how the wording of the questions does not lead to <u>an</u> answer. However, equally – I don't want to have my application viewed negatively for raising these issues!</p><p></p><p>Any advice is much appreciated! Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M&ALawyer, post: 43314, member: 2647"] I recently completed a verbal reasoning test for a well known City firm. This test had ambiguously worded questions, which led to multiple potential answers. I have researched the definitions used for words in the questions, and consulted others - and I am confident in my evaluation. I would like to reiterate this is over the choice of words in the question - rather than the material itself. I have probably completed 50+ of these verbal reasoning/Watson Glaser tests, and not had any issues with the wording of the questions previously. To my knowledge, this test appeared to be designed in-house rather than a company such as Pearson. I am considering writing to HR, explaining with clear examples how the wording of the questions does not lead to [U]an[/U] answer. However, equally – I don't want to have my application viewed negatively for raising these issues! Any advice is much appreciated! Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Contacting HR over possible errors in test
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…